About Me

Name: Katy Grimes
Email: fetchingjen@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Taxes - Still think these are for the "Rich"?

Building Permit Tax
CDL License Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Federal Income Tax (Fed)
Federal Unemployment Tax (FU TA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax)
IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Tax
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service charge taxes
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax (Truckers)
Sales Taxes
Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax  
State Income Tax  
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Tax
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax  
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Tax
Vehicle License Registration T ax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax
(And to think, we left British Rule to avoid so many taxes)

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
 
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago...
and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.

We had absolutely no national debt...
We had the largest middle class in the world...
and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.
 
What happened? politicians.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming "Green Job" Myth

The world according to Henry Waxman kills millions of jobs, raises unemployment and inflation, increases the cost for electricity and gas, and the GDP drops. What a fun guy Waxman must be - and a Socialist. California has been prolifically producing some of the worst human beings to ever enter the Senate and Congress.
 
The Heritage Foundation and NCPA report on the Waxman/Markey bill on global warming:
Reps. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) modified their global warming proposal from the draft version published in March 2009.  For the most part, the changes focused on the distribution of the allowance revenue -- the equivalent of tax revenue, says the Heritage Foundation.

Though there was also a slight easing of targeted emissions reductions for 2020, which resulted in a marginally lower economic impact, the new distribution of allowances created a less efficient pattern of government expenditures and more than offset the gain from the lower cap for 2020.

According to researchers, by 2035, the Waxman-Markey bill would:

  • Destroy 1,105,000 jobs on average, with peak years seeing unemployment rise by over 2,479,000 jobs.
  • Raise electricity rates 90 percent after adjusting for inflation;
  • Raise inflation-adjusted gasoline prices by 74 percent.
  • Raise residential natural gas prices by 55 percent.
  • Raise an average family's annual energy bill by $1,500.
  • Increase inflation-adjusted federal debt by 26 percent, or $29,150 additional federal debt per person, again after adjusting for inflation.

Ultimately, this bill would result in government-set caps on energy use that damage the economy and hobble growth--the very growth that supports investment and innovation, says Heritage. 

But is all of this economic pain justified by gains against global warming, asks Heritage?  

  • Waxman-Markey raises energy prices by 55-90 percent.
  • These higher energy prices push unemployment up by 1,105,000 jobs. In aggregate, gross domestic product (GDP) drops by over $9.6 trillion.
  • The next generation will inherit a federal debt pumped up by $29,150 per person, say researchers.

Source: William W. Beach, et al., "Son of Waxman-Markey: More Politics Makes for a More Costly Bill," Heritage Foundation, WebMemo, No. 2450, May 18, 2009.

For text: http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm2450.cfm

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »