About Me

Name: Katy Grimes
Email: fetchingjen@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Sacramento City Council - Lost Democracy

Tonight the Sacramento City Council demonstrated that they are completely unfamiliar with the American tradition of the Democratic process. They also demonstrated that they are lockstep with the local unions - or not man enough to deal with them. It was also apparent that they had pre-arranged the vote ahead of the meeting.  

Tonight's meeting was an enormous waste of everyone's time - especially the folks who took the time out of their usual schedules and don't get paid to sit at City Council meetings listening to the self-congratulating and drivel coming from city employees to one-another, on what a great job they've all done with the budget. 

The biggest waste of time was when mayor Johnson thanked everyone present who had spoken out about the budget issues, and told them that their suggestions could be used next budget year if not used this year. He tipped his hat, gave a wink-wink to the local unions present, and voted quickly to pass the budget.

The union-bloated budget cuts all of the little guys who work for the parks department who already don't make enough to live on, cuts necessary park maintenance including public park restrooms, cuts some programs for kids, closes swimming pools and the like. 

Are you seeing a theme here? 

The City wussies allowed local union bosses to determine who would be cut from the budget for the city, so as not to upset their higher-up members. No mention of the lower paid employees that will be sacrificed so that the older, highly paid, management city employees can keep their pay raises . No mention of the regional public parks that are already being ignored by maintenance workers (who are out looking for jobs after receiving lay-off notices), and no mention of the bathrooms that will be closed in said parks, that service park visitors, picnic groups, family reunions, grad parties, car clubs, volleyball tournaments, baseball, soccer, football teams,  runners, walkers, stroller-pushing moms, fishermen, bird watchers, golfers, bicyclists, and passers by making a quick pit stop.

The Sacramento City council demonstrated that they are so removed from the reality of city life and live in an insulated bubble of their own choosing, when they conducted little scripted discussions tonight with each other and members of City staff. 

Council member Rob Fong in his carefully scripted exchange with Parks and Rec department Director Jim Combs,  fooled no one with the bad acting. Between Fong's soft-ball questions and Combs' ambiguous, disingenuous answers, it felt like an episode of CSPAN. Lauren Hammond's "heartfelt" speech lacked... heart. Steve Cohn, in his meandering soliloquy to the residents, left the folks looking around awkwardly, asking each other, "what is he talking about?" And Sandy Sheedy said nothing of substance, as usual.

However, when Mayor Johnson wrapped up the budget discussion with his insincere thanks and half-hearted comment about the usefulness of the proposals in next year's budget (maybe), members in the audience knew wed been had. Then entire evening was an exercise in futility. THe City Council could have been replaced tonight with large puppets, maneuvered by Local 39 and the Fire Fighters Union.

Sacramento is operating undemocratically. The elected officials are not listening to the voting citizens and instead, putting all of their eggs in the unions basket. This is non representative of the democratic process in a Representative Republic. 

If I was a City Council member right now, I'd be looking for another job. The wrath coming from the residents is not going to be pretty... so I have heard.

more to come...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sacramento City Council Performance

Last night as I sat in the audience watching the Sacramento City Council perform, I felt that I'd been ripped-off. The performance was bush-league, and not even worthy of  Middle-school production.
 
For several hours, they demonstrated how ill-prepared most of them are. They demonstrated that they prefer to let "staff" make decisions for them (Lauren Hammond). Council members demonstrated that they are not engaged at all in the issues (Rob Fong). They demonstrated that they are beholden to local union 39 (Ray Tretheway). Tretheway even demonstrated that he is oblivious to the conflict of interest he has as Executive Director of the Sacramento Tree Foundation, as he talked down to a City planner about the "tree canopy" and "Urban forest" he thought should be included in the updated Urban City design plan for downtown. As I sat there trying to take notes while Tretheway spoke, I found the task nearly impossible; he never completes a sentence of thought.
 
Councilman Kevin McCarty, Cohn  and Sandy Sheedy made sense a couple of times - McCarty when he pressed the City Finance Director for information about whether or not the City was laying off more line workers and saving management jobs and salaries - she could not answer. Sheedy made snese when she refused to vote for an intent motion for the budget as proposed.  All of the other council members voted to pass it. Cohn pressed city staff on a bogus contract.
 
One item of interest on the agenda was the Old Sacramento Tour Boat Interim Lease Agreement. A member of the audience and his attorney addressed the Council, asking why the bid process had not been open as they (Commodore Events) would have bid on it and probably won the bid instead of mega-tour boat company, Hornblower (who operates Alcatraz and Ellis Island tour boats). It was abundantly clear that there was only the one "bid" and the process had been done hurridly in order to award it to Hornblower, but not just the "interim" contract. Apparently Hornblower Company was going to be allowed to sign a long-term contract courtest of staff's recommendations - "5-10 years" as the city staff employee said sheepishly. She became defensive when Councilman Cohn asked her instead to consider a 2-year contract as the RFP for the process was already 5 years old. When  The Mayor asked the City Manager to step outside and meet with city staff and the disgruntled party to see if they coudl come to a compromise.
 
The groups eventually came back in and the calendar item was resumed, and promptly passed a unanimous vote of council. I wonder what went on in the back room to appease the attorney and his client...
 
Councilwoman Hammond on several occasions, challenged her colleagues on their questioning of city staff procedures saying "we already proved that when we don't let staff do their jobs, we are wrong." She clearly likes to have staff do her job for her as well. If the City council is not challenging city staff procedures, recommendations and policy, who will? The City Manager? I don't think so.
 
Councilman Rob Fong never once participated in the meeting, and he looked like a clown, dressed in a neon tie and even brighter shirt. Four audience members spoke about the need to maintain Land Park, and Fong never even acknowledged their presence, and never uttered a word. His lack of engagement in his own neighborhood is shameless.
 
Councilwoman Bonnie Pannell was also uncharacteristically quiet. 
 
The bulk of the audience members were present to argue budget cuts in park maintenance, speaking eloquently to a future of closed park bathrooms, weeds and uncut grass, garbage problems, crime, public urination, and a myriad of other problems that will arise if parks are allowed to degrade. Additionally, one speaker presented seven different options for cuts and budget reforms, for which both McCarty and the Mayor thanked the group, pointing out that they never recieve alternate proposals when city residents show up to challenge budget cuts. www.rescuesacramentoparks.blogspot.com
 
The Sacramento City Council is woefully inadequate on financial and business issues. They only seem to perk up when social programs are the issue. There are moments when several of the members seem to grasp the issue - Cohn with the tour boat issue, McCarty with the budget issue, Sheedy refusing to vote on the budget without more information - but mostly they sit back and allow the City Manager, City Attorney and various City staffers do the work for them, without ever verifying issues themselves, or even being prepared ahead with pertinent questions.
 
The Mayor is clearly only one voice, one vote, on the Council. After witnessing several council meetings lately, more than ever, Sacramento needs to change the City Charter and make the Mayor the CEO of the City. Last night's meeting would have gone very differently had a CEO been in charge. And we desperately need to elect council members who understand and are even vaguely familiar with finance and business.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

City Threatens Park Decay

Let me get this off my chest - The City runs a travel agency! And teen health centers... And senior enrichment classes... the waste is staggering. And there is an Executive Director being paid for every program. The Director of Parks & Recreation Department is paid  $113,460.00 - $170,196.00 annually. HERE
 
During a budget crisis such as the one we are currently in the middle of, a typical tactic of government officials is to instill fear in order to manipulate the voters into agreeing to higher taxes... instead of making reasonable cuts to save money. Reasonable cuts? Perhaps looking into the bloated Parks and Rec budget might illuminate the issue... The City of Sacramento Parks and Recreation Department is doing this in a big way.
 
I am on the parks committee of the Land Park Community Association. We are actively working to prevent the demise of our parks. A friend who heads up the Parks Committee for the LPCA, submiteed this to our membership: Last week, the City Manager released a proposed budget which calls for the firing of 50% of all park maintenance workers, as well as dozens of seasonal and part-time workers.  If the City Council approves these cuts, William Land Park this summer will start to look more like the front yard of a foreclosed home in Del Paso Heights than the crown jewel of city parks and the treasured centerpiece of our neighborhood.  Here are the facts:
As reported in the Bee, the layoffs in park workers will, according to City staff, have the following immediate effects on Land Park and other city parks:
    - Grass mowing will be reduced from the current weekly mowing to just once every 2 to 3 weeks;
    - Park trash cans, which are now emptied daily, will be emptied only once or twice a week; and
    - All park restrooms will be closed, except for during special events.
    Park garbage cans will be overflowing much of the time with garbage strewn throughout the park. Mowing park grass every 2 to 3 weeks will make it unsanitary and unsafe for families to picnic or children to play baseball or soccer. Closing all park restrooms will be an unmitigated disaster, as park goers will be relieving themselves in park bushes and in the yards of nearby homes.  Taken together, the proposed cuts will make the park virtually unusable.
 
Without making any cuts in personnel, the park I live near is already starting to look seedy. They haven't mowed the grass since... the day before nancy Pelosi's visit to the Angelides house, along  Land Park street. Hmmm.
 
Letting a park turn into a wasteland is a really stupid idea, but typical of the non-creative government thinking. More than ever, people are turning to parks for weekend outings, entertainment and picnics. Most City parks charge a permit fee for use however, if the parks look like a ghetto, who will use them? Who will visit a park with no bathrooms, hip-high brown grass and putrid ponds?
 
The City is attempting to force Sacramento residents agreeing to increased fees and taxes in order to justify not letting parks decay. But we're not buying it. Most of us work in private businesses and know that they only way to survive during a ecession is to make job cuts, reduce salaries and benefits. No one at the City is proposing cutting the fat middle layer of expensive but worthless management positions.
 
Under the Recreation side of Parks and Rec, are these programs: http://www.cityofsacramento.org/ParksandRecreation/recreation/index.html
 
The 4th R Child Care
Leisure Enrichment Classes
Camp Sacramento
Aquatics/Pools
Community Centers
youth and Teen programs
Sports
Older Adults
Safari Tours (a Travel Agency)
Access Leisure
Neighborhood Block Parties
 
The City of Sacramento is in the child care business, runs a travel agency, and under the heading of Leisure Enrichment Classes is  Aquatics and swim lessons, seasonal programs at the Children's Services (see below for additional publications), Teen Services, Services for Older Adults, City Safari Tours, Access Leisure, Adult Sports Leagues including softball and Special Events. Aquatics and swim lessons, seasonal programs at the Children's Services (see below for additional publications), Teen Services, Services for Older Adults, City Safari Tours, Access Leisure, Adult Sports Leagues including softball and Special Events including running a skate park.  Cover the Kids  states this as their mission: Cover the Kids (CTK), Sacramento Children's Health Initiative believe that ALL children deserve access to affordable comprehensive health coverage. What do they do? They are a service that puts parents in touch with government healthcare... Wait! Don't the government healthcare programs already have outreach services!? What a waste.
It's suspicious that my computer firewall won't let me link onto "Teen Services." And don't forget Safari Tours... the travel agency: http://www.cityofsacramento.org/ParksandRecreation/recreation/safari.htm
 
Am I reading this correctly? $45 million last year, and $38 proposed for 2009/2010? Of that, $Park Maintenance is $9.7 million, down from $11 million, and Park Planning is $767,000 down from $1.3 million. But the whopper is "Children and Community Recreation" is budgeted at $17 million down from $19.8 million.
 
You tell me where we can easily cut the ridiculous recreation department budget instead of picking on Park Maintenance. The City Manager needs to get his head out of his arse and start making some real budget cuts. The threats will only backfire.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »