About Me

Name: Katy Grimes
Email: fetchingjen@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Dare I Say "Black & White?"

It seems that the only people who can "legitimately" talk about race are blacks and Democrats. The rest of us are the race-baiters when we dare to disagree.
 
However, we who dare to think for ourselves know that the left is desperately reaching... grasping... and now gasping, for anything to deflect from their candiate who exudes... well... lot's of air and white noise.
 
The latest hysteria from those-who-can-talk-about-race is that Sarah Palin is a she-princess for the KKK because she wears WHITE. Apparently, whenever a conservative wears white, it's a secret signal to other conservatives that we are really devout KKK members.

A Democratic Underground blogger wrote this: “Palin is wearing white again, inciting the racist crowds. She should just drop all pretense and put on her white hood and light up a cross. She is a despicable human being.” If it wasn't so sick, it might be funny.

Michelle Malkin wrote in her syndicated column today: *Obama supporters on the heavily-traffic Democratic Underground website (where such mainstream Democrats as Elizabeth Edwards hang out) saw the ghost of the Ku Klux Klan in Sarah Palin’s white suit jacket. Yes, white clothes = racism.
“Palin is wearing white again, inciting the racist crowds. She should just drop all pretense and put on her white hood and light up a cross. She is a despicable human being,” fumed a DU poster. “Grand Princess of the KKK,” proclaimed another. They’re “trying to send subtle signals to their rabid base,” yet another member of Obama’s rabid base declared.
 
My racial decoder ring must be on the fritz. Because I’m not getting the signal. If she wears white stockings, drinks a vanilla milk shake, and refers to budgetary black holes, are those incitements, too? And what about her gorgeous white teeth? Perhaps she should drink more coffee — hold the white cream! — to avoid emitting further racial radiation.
I spoke earlier this week with an eloquent, educated retired gentleman, and he shared this thought about the Democrats and race: "The top five reasons I am not voting for Obama primarly are because he is completely devoid of substance on issues important to me and most Americans: the economy, the military, health care, education, national security, and may include as number #5, that I am concerned about this black man being in the White House - but only because it is Barack Obama and his terrifying black, racist, Socialist agenda. Obama made it an issue, not me. If we were talking about Colin Powell or Michael Steele, because they don't make race an issue at all any more than I do, "being black" would not be an issue." Well said.
 
Barack Obama is the highest profile race-baiter since Jesse Jackson ran for President. Apparently, one cannot be a Democrat without first being black, gay or lesbian, or a woman.
 
Michelle Malkin: "Time’s Karen Tumulty, who spotted racist goblins in the recent McCain ad criticizing Obama for seeking advice from Fannie Mae corruptocrat, Franklin Raines. “Sinister images of two black men, followed by one of a vulnerable-looking elderly white woman,” Tumulty balked in a blog post titled “McCain plays the race card.”
 
Um, “sinister?” The ad’s photos of Obama and Raines were standard shots — some with dour expressions, others smiling. The fact that Tumulty perceived them as “sinister” suggests that she should perform a self-racism exam before diagnosing anyone else."
 
For more Obama campaign reading:
 
 
 
 and read this funny post:
 
All of this by the media to deflect away from Barack Obama's dangerous friends and terrifying associations.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama - "New Party" Member

You must read this from The American Thinker:
 

Archives prove Obama was a New Party member

Thomas Lifson
Another piece in the puzzle of Barack Obama has been revealed, greatly strengthening the picture of a man groomed by an older generation of radical leftists for insertion into the American political process, trading on good looks, brains, educational pedigree, and the desire of the vast majority of the voting public to right the historical racial wrongs of the land.

The New Party was a radical left organization, established in 1992, to amalgamate far left groups and push the United States into socialism by forcing the Democratic Party to the left. It was an attempt to regroup the forces on the left in a new strategy to take power, burrowing from within. The party only lasted until 1998, when its strategy of "fusion" failed to withstand a Supreme Court ruling, but after, but the membership, including Barack Obama, continued to move the Democrats leftward with spectacular success. 

Erick Erickson, editor of RedState, explained fusion in a Human Events
article:

Fusion is a pretty simple concept. A candidate could run as both a Democrat and a New Party member to signal the candidate was, in fact, a left-leaning candidate, or at least not a center-left DLC type candidate. If the candidate -- let's call him Barack Obama -- received only 500 votes in the Democratic Party against another candidate who received 1000 votes, Obama would clearly not be the nominee. But, if Obama also received 600 votes from the New Party, Obama's New Party votes and Democratic votes would be fused. He would be the Democratic nominee with 1100 votes.

The fusion idea set off a number of third parties, but the New Party was probably the most successful. A March 22, 1998 In These Times article by John Nichols showed just how successful.  "After six years, the party has built what is arguably the most sophisticated left-leaning political operation the country has seen since the decline of the Farmer-Labor, Progressive and Non-Partisan League groupings of the early part of the century .... In 1996, it helped Chicago's Danny Davis, a New Party member, win a Democratic congressional primary, thereby assuring his election in the majority-black district .... The threat of losing New Party support, or of the New Party running its own candidates against conservative Democrats, would begin a process of forcing the political process to the left, [Joel] Rogers argued."

Fusion, fortunately for the country, died in 1997. William Rehnquist, writing for a 6-3 Supreme Court, found the concept was not a protected constitutional right. It was two years too late to stop Obama.

J. Brown of Politically Drunk on Power has dug up multiple documentary sources (with hyperlinks) proving that Barack Obama was a member of the New Party, despite alleged attempts to cover up his tracks by scrubbing evidence. He or she deserves tremendous praise for doing this detective work.

Obama's career bears many signs of being helped along by the radical left.  At the critical moment when he entered electoral politics, he was part of a movement to take over an established political party and dirct it to the task of building a socialist America.

Hat tip: Rocco DiPippo
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama McCain Debate

Hugh Hewitt on the debate - by the way, I agree...

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:30 PM
As expected, McCain shines and Obama is on the defensive throughout.  The good news for Obama is that more than 30 minutes were not on the specifics of foreign policy.  But Obama stumbled badly on Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan.  McCain simply knows this stuff, and Obama again and again betrays that he does not.  

"I honestly don't believe that Senator Obama has the understanding or the experience," and hitting Obama on his stubbornness was a very strong close for McCain.  "I don't need any on the job training."

A caller just said it was like watching Master and Grasshopper.
*******

Obama spent the entire debate trying to sound like a conservative. And whining when McCain threw a solid punch. When are people going to realize that Obama is a snot-nosed punk? He's a whining, sniveling, condescending spoiled punk, and his "my mama worked two jobs to keep food on our table" routine does not work. He went to Harvard and Yale courtesy of Affirmative Action. As an average, drug taking high school student... well, you do the math.

Do we really want someone for our President who couldn't get into Harvard on his own merit? I prefer Sarah Barracuda who went to state college - more like the rest of America. John McCain isn't so bad either... the USNA served him well.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's "Classic Liar Behavior"

Obama cannot continue to lie about his relationship with Bill Ayers:
 
Andrew McCarthy at NRO writes: "Be clear on that much: Whether clothed as a terrorist or an academic, Ayers has made abundantly clear in his public statements, both before and after he established a working relationship and mutual admiration society with Obama, that he remains a revolutionary fueled by hatred of the United States. And while Obama now ludicrously pleads ignorance about Ayers’s terrorism — the terrorism that made the unabashed Ayers an icon of the Left — understand that this rabid anti-Americanism is the common denominator running through Obama’s orbit of influences.

Yes, Ayers is blunter than Obama. As he so delicately told the Times, America makes him “want to puke.” The smoother Obama is content to say our society needs fundamental “change.” But what they’re talking about is not materially different.

Such sentiments should make Obama unelectable. So, when it comes to his own radical moorings, Obama is engaged in classic liar behavior. He changes his story as the facts change — and the burden is always on you to dig up the facts, not on him to come clean. Yesterday, asked to comment on the Ayers relationship, David Axelrod, Obama’s top political adviser, hilariously chirped, “There’s no evidence that they’re close.” Translation: Get back to us when you can prove more damaging information — until then, we don’t need to further refine our perjury.

And then Axelrod gave us still more lies: “There’s no evidence that Obama in any way subscribed to any of Ayers views.”

Oh yeah? Well, Mr. Axelrod, how do you explain Obama’s breathless endorsement of Ayers’s 1997 Leftist polemic on the criminal-justice system, A Kind and Just Parent? As Stanley Kurtz has recounted, Ayers’s book is a radical indictment of American society: "
read more HERE at National Review Online.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ACORN Voter Fraud - Again

LAS VEGAS (AP) - Nevada state authorities are raiding the Las Vegas headquarters of an organization that works to get low-income people to vote.
A Nevada secretary of state's office spokesman said Tuesday that investigators are looking for evidence of voter fraud at the office of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, also called ACORN.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Do The Math

Who do you think is really responsible for the economy being in the tank?
 
Think back to the 2006 elections - what happened? Let's reflect.
 
George Bush has been in office for 7 1/2 years.  The first six the economy was fine.

A little over two years ago:

 1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
 2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
 3) the unemployment rate was 4.5%.
 4) the DOW JONES hit a record high -- 14,000 +
 5) American's were buying new cars,taking cruises,vacations overseas, etc

  But American's wanted 'CHANGE'!  So, in 2006 they voted in a Democratic Congress and yes--we got 'CHANGE' all right. In the PAST YEAR:

 1) Consumer confidence has plummeted ;
 2) Gasoline is now over $4 a gallon & climbing!;
 3) Unemployment is up to 5.5% (a 10% increase);
 4) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $12 TRILLION DOLLARS and prices are still dropping;
 5) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
 6) as I write, THE DOW is probing another low -  $2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS HAS EVAPORATED FROM      
            THEIR STOCKS, BONDS&MUTUALFUNDSINVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS!
 
YES, IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE...AND WE SURE GOT IT! 

REMEMBER THE PRESIDENT HAS NO CONTROL OVER ANY OF THESE ISSUES, ONLY CONGRESS.

AND WHAT HAS CONGRESS DONE IN THE LAST TWO YEARS ......ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

NOW THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT CLAIMS HE IS GOING TO REALLY GIVE US CHANGE ALONG WITH A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS!!!!

JUST HOW MUCH MORE 'CHANGE' DO YOU THINK YOU CAN STAND?
 
Be sure to thank Nancy Pelosi.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"The Gloves Are Off , Heals Are On"

During an interview with conservative political pundit Bill Kristol, Republican vice presidential nominee Alaska Governor Sarah Palin gave a public suggestion to her boss, Republican presidential nominee Arizona Senator John McCain, on how to run his campaign: "Take the gloves off."

Palin made her comment at the end of an interview with Kristol in an op-ed column published in The New York Times.

Palin declared yesterday that for her part, "The gloves are off, the heels are on," as she opened a new front against Democratic presidential nominee Illinois Senator Barack Obama regarding his relationship with unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers.

From the interview: "Palin also made clear that she was eager for the McCain-Palin campaign to be more aggressive in helping the American people understand “who the real Barack Obama is.” Part of who Obama is, she said, has to do with his past associations, such as with the former bomber Bill Ayers. Palin had raised the topic of Ayers Saturday on the campaign trail, and she maintained to me that Obama, who’s minimized his relationship with Ayers, “hasn’t been wholly truthful” about this.

I pointed out that Obama surely had a closer connection to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright than to Ayers — and so, I asked, if Ayers is a legitimate issue, what about Reverend Wright?

She didn’t hesitate: “To tell you the truth, Bill, I don’t know why that association isn’t discussed more, because those were appalling things that that pastor had said about our great country, and to have sat in the pews for 20 years and listened to that — with, I don’t know, a sense of condoning it, I guess, because he didn’t get up and leave — to me, that does say something about character. But, you know, I guess that would be a John McCain call on whether he wants to bring that up.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A ‘Red’ Writer Living in a ‘Blue’ State

I used to cherish the American tradition of going to my local poling station on Election Day and voting in my neighborhood. Each election, I took my son with me; I even brought him into the booth and together we voted. I always gave him the “I Voted” sticker.

However, the past two years I have voted by absentee ballot. I grew tired of the volunteers at the polling station loudly asking “Democrat or Republican?” and having people in line behind me hiss when I stated “Republican.” I even asked the volunteers why they took such pleasure demanding identification of a “traitor” in our vastly liberal neighborhood, but only received stares back.

However, it is far worse being a “red” writer in a “blue” state. Conservative women, in particular, are as publicly abused as minorities who identify with social and economic conservatives. Conservative blacks are labeled “race traitors”; Jews are “Zionist neo-conservatives loyal to Israel first”; and conservative women are pole-dancing “Stepford Wives,” who should stay at home and shut their lipstick’d snouts.

Attack of the Left
The assaults from the liberal left come in many forms. The public insults are just the tip of the iceberg; most of the attacks are behind-the-scenes manipulations and sneak attacks—and coming from the local neighborhood association as well as difficult city employees. Daring to speak out as a conservative woman elicits a violent, irrational reaction from the left.

My husband has been a target of the attacks because I am a conservative female political columnist. My son was the victim of retaliation by a few high school teachers—all irrational and sick behavior by the loony left, and unfortunately because I am a conservative female columnist.

The left has a creepy, Stalin-esque approach to conservatism and writers. The intimidation tactics and sneak attacks are an attempt to silence conservative writers and the conservative voice.

But why the attacks on conservatives—particularly conservative women and minorities? Because the liberal monopoly over journalism and public policy is being eroded by conservative writers, radio talk show hosts, the Fox News network and a few brave newspapers. These media outlets provide a voice for many hard-working Americans. Conservative journalists have proven that many Americans do not share in liberal doctrine and prejudices—issues such as arms control, tax increases, welfare, affirmative action, nationalized health care and communism are subjects that conservative Americans are not in lockstep with liberals, by any means.

Two-Left-Feet Politics
Consequently, liberals are consumed with hatred and vitriol for the conservative voice—particularly a conservative female. The vicious liberal attacks on high-profile conservative women are notorious, most recently with the attempted character assassination of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, referring to her as a “hick,” a “dominatrix,” a “bubble-headed beauty queen” and attacking her special needs child. Condoleezza Rice was depicted in a cartoon as a “mammy” armed with her “hair straightener.” Add to that list author Ann Coulter, who has been physically attacked at college campuses and called unspeakable names; first lady Laura Bush, who was called a “docile doormat” amongst other unflattering names; and commentator Michelle Malkin, who has been physically accosted by protestors and has been threatened with murder. When conservatives disagree, we discuss and argue our issues using such dangerous weapons as facts, research and humor. But when liberals disagree, they use the most vile, debased methods of showing their dissent.

Liberal media outlets have spent the last eight years trying to discredit President Bush on any number of issues, the least of which is the Iraq war. While conservative expression is correctly identified as opinion, the “news” we see on network television and read in periodicals like the Sacramento Bee and the New York Times is supposed to be devoid of political prejudice, but is not. Supposed “news” stories are wrought with opinion, snarky liberal comments and censored of relevant details.

Liberals know that conservative columnists and journalists are dangerous to the liberal cause because we are challenging their liberal status quo—something sacrosanct among members of the left.
***********
From my column in The Sacramento Union Friday October 3, 2008
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Twinkle Twinkle Obama's Red Star"

The People's Cube reworked Obama's children's song. http://www.thepeoplescube.com/
Yesterday I compared the manipulation of the children to Hitler Youth - apparently I wasn't alone in my thinking:
 
 
Sing For Change: Children Compose Hymns To Obama
By Red Square
10/1/2008, 2:37 am



Sing for Change chronicles a recent Sunday afternoon, when children, on their own will, gathered to sing original songs in the belief that their singing would lift up our communities for the coming election. Light, hope, courage and love shine through these nonvoting children who believe that their very best contribution to the Obama campaign is to sing.
  
This music video embodies the nature of the Obama campaign: its grassroots inspiration, its inclusiveness, its community building. The willingness of all was a testament to our hope, unity, courage, joy and belief in the future represented by these children.

~
We are offering the video to everyone, the Obama campaign and all media with high hopes that we can all join together to Sing for Change.



Creepy and sick... if it wasn't so true. My favorite comment was from

By Comrade 9
10/1/2008, 7:21 am


Exceptionally glorious music, comrades! Definitely got that progressive tingle progressing down my leg, that's for sure. This one got the same tingle running like a lackey dog down my other one:

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Villaraigosa and ACORN Shenanigans

Los Angeles Mayor and Governor Wannabe Antonio Villaraigosa is in bed with ACORN.
 
I had to go to Canada to learn this - In a story by The Canadian Free Press (CFP), they expose Villaraigosa's plan to acquire billions of dollars for public housing:
 
*********
(CFP) The vote fraud factory known as ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) is apparently supporting Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s crazy push for $5 billion in so-called affordable housing.

As the nation stares into the economic abyss precisely because of housing-related tomfoolery, Villaraigosa’s plan calls for $1 billion in government to be spent as part of the $5 billion housing project.

The mayor essentially admitted that his plan is insane.

“I know that budgets are tight . . . credit is almost nonexistent,” said the apparently psychotic Villaraigosa. “But we’re going to reject the cynics . . . and build a brighter future for those kids who are in the corner over there.”

Maybe Villaraigosa’s been using some of the same crack cocaine that ACORN has used to pay its operatives in its various voter registration drives.

And this isn’t the first time Villaraigosa has procured ACORN’s rent-a-mob services.

According to an LA Weekly report, ACORN received nearly $73,000 from an education-related pressure group founded by the mayor. The money went for campaign consulting services, travel and “meetings and appearances.”
**********
 
Villaraigosa is another Democrat swine, feeding at the public trough. His only interest is what serves him well. For a guy who has been caught several times already with his pants down (literally), he should watch over his shoulder. Maybe the liberal California media is ignoring his antics, but the rest of us are not. Perhaps he should clean up his own house, get his GED and go back to school to learn U.S. History. It's not Mexifornia yet.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Voter Fraud, Brought To You By Obama

Last week I wrote about the Ohio Secretary of State already at work disqualifying Republican voter registrations: Voter Fraud 101
 
Today, Michelle Malkin has uncovered an even bigger problem in Ohio: Homeless Ohioans for Obama registering in droves(Ohhh my)

Malkin writes: "Oh, dear Lord. We are so screwed. Watch this:

The guy promoting the free taxi program to register the homeless in Ohio exults: “It’s a perfect opportunity for them to come in, register at a temporary address like a homeless shelter or a YMCA or something like that. They can register at that address because they don’t know where they’re going to be tomorrow or next week.”

Another woman describes trolling bus stops and picking up prospects: “I asked ‘em if they’re registered to vote and if they weren’t, I said ‘Get in the car, I’m bringing you!’”

A homeless thug now registered to vote comments: “They picked me up. They seen me walkin’ around. So day said, ‘You wanna vote?’ I said, ‘Yeah, I’ll vote.’ (laughs) Day said, ‘We’ll take you anywhere you want.’ I said, ‘Dat’s cool’…If day say ’sign the ballot,’ just give ‘em and do exactly what they want you to do.’ I mean, hey, dis is America, you know?” (laughs).

Who does this new voter support?

“Barack! I mean, I want him to do his thang. You know, do his thug thizzle. You know. That’s how I like it to be. You know. (laughs).”

Organizers hoped to sign up 1,000 like him by the end of the day yesterday — and more all week.

ACORN, as you know, is heavily involved in these fraud-riddled voter registration efforts in Ohio.
 
Read the whole sordid story here. Ohio is a key state (remember the 2000 and 2004 elections?). It appears that Obama isn't taking any chances and doing a preemptive strike.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Children of the Campaign

A group of Obama-supporting parents recently got together...
"a recent Sunday..."
"a neighbor's house..."
"Venice, Ca.." Sing For Change (for Obama). The song is a terrifying example of the manipulation, and mind numbing of children. Of course it's in California.
 
Here is a video of children, ages 5-12, "singing for Change" to their Dear Leader, Barack Obama. Rush Limbaugh just played this on his radio program and said this was orchestrated by some Hollywood types. It shows the level of mind control going on in America today, reminiscent of Hitler Youth, Chairman Mao tactics, and little kids singing for Kim Jong Il.
What if at this same school they try to sing Christmas Carols this December, or put on a Christmas pagent?

Guess who is one of the drivers behind this video? Non-other than the head of NBC, Jeff Zucker. It says so in a write-up on this video posted at Obama's own website:

When Jeff Zucker went to pick up the camera package, Ted Schilowitz happened to be there and offered a RED camera set up on a Steadi Cam.

What the children and a few adults accomplished in a few hours on a Sunday afternoon embodies the nature of the Obama campaign: its grassroots inspiration, its inclusiveness, its community building.

Is there any wonder MSNBC / NBC might as well be called "Obama Television?"

Thank You Drudge Report

If this kind of mind-numbing garbage is going on even before Obama gets elected, imagine what's in store during an Obama presidency. Communism, Stalinism... Socialism will be the least of the "isms."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Questions For Heather Fargo

From my Sacramento Union column Friday September 26, 2008:
Sacramento Mayor Heather Fargo is fighting for her political life. She is running a depressing political campaign while trying to retain her perk-filled mayoral position. First elected to the Sacramento City Council in 1989 representing District 1, she was re-elected to the council in 1994 and 1998. Fargo was elected mayor in November 2000 and became the city’s first full-time mayor after lobbying aggressively for the November 2002 passage of the City Charter Amendment, Measure S.

Running on her record is not serving Heather Fargo well. Full of contradictions and questions, Fargo’s “record” leaves voters with more questions than answers. However, as Sacramento voters get to know Kevin Johnson through his town hall meetings and 20,000 personal visits to residents’ homes, Fargo is becoming more of a mystery in that “political insider” way. Her public persona façade is cracking, leaving voters to wonder who the real Fargo is.

Talking to other city voters, the criticism is that instead of answering questions about city business, Fargo panders, condescends, patronizes and evades in-depth answers. As Election Day gets closer, voters seem irritated by Fargo’s seemingly shallow answers, contrasting Johnson’s detailed answers about violent crime, safe streets, schools and the budget, as well as economic development.

What’s so tough about these issues for a 20-year veteran of city politics? Or is it that Heather Fargo thinks that we won’t understand the answers?

A writer friend of mine says, “eight is enough” whenever we talk about Fargo. I believe term limits should have been written into the city charter when Fargo granted herself a full-time position. Until then, perhaps Heather Fargo will start giving voters answers that are lucid and detailed.

Things Left Unanswered
I have had five in-depth interviews with Kevin Johnson. Consequently, I have written much about where he stands on local issues. Given that Fargo’s campaign did not return any of my requests for interviews, or even my phone calls, perhaps she will answer some of the questions that are lingering. (Mayor Fargo, please feel free to email your answers to my editor at Editor@SacUnion.com. We are happy to print your answers in the next edition.)

Question 1
With the sale of the Sheraton Grand Hotel for $130 million to developer David Taylor, the city will see about $50 million in net proceeds after retiring the bonds issued to finance the project. Shouldn’t the proceeds go to the general fund, instead of to more redevelopment, given our $58 million deficit?

Question 2
Regarding the many “traffic calming” projects, are you supportive of “traffic calming” concepts? Why, with our roads in such deplorable condition, are traffic-slowing devices still the priority?

Question 3
One of the mayoral candidates said during the primary election that he’d cut 800 city jobs if he were mayor. Do you feel that the city of Sacramento is over-staffed? What have you done about this or what will you do? How do you plan to reduce the bureaucracies in Sacramento, without a golden handshake?

Question 4
With a $58 million deficit, why continue unnecessary spending on tree research, for example? What gives you confidence that the city will balance its budget?

Question 5
Why the bad blood with Sacramento Police Department? The police officer’s union has gone as far to now endorse your opponent. You said earlier in the year that you wanted to add more police officers to the street and that public safety is a priority for you, but now want to cut the police department budget instead of cutting unnecessary spending or city administrative jobs. What will you do to repair the relationship with city police?

Question 6
Do you feel that Sacramento’s political leadership should start to advocate for a slowing of our regional growth or ignore the issue? Or should they favor ever-increasing population because of the tax revenue?

Mayor Fargo, I await your answers. Many of Sacramento’s residents are small business owners; faithful, dedicated and hard-working employees; we are responsible citizens concerned about the future of our city. We are all waiting for your answers. Believe me—we can handle it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

John Kerry's Face Trumps O'Reilly Interview

Last evening on the the O'Reilly factor, John Kerry lost it. However, I could not focus on his words or his message because I was too busy watching his immovable face. Kerry has had so much Botox that everything above his mouth is fixed. Nothing moves except his eyes.
He must be seeing nancy Pelosi's plastic surgeon. Imagine being so vain and insecure.
 
For the actual "news:"
Newshounds reported: John Kerry got pretty angry last night on The O'Reilly Factor, 9/29, after O'Reilly pushed the right buttons. At first he was in his usual low key mode of defense until finally his breaking point was reached and he asked O'Reilly for permission to disagree with him. BOR did not look pleased but how could he refuse? It's doubtful that Kerry will be invited back to The Factor in the near future but we can expect O'Reilly to milk the exchange for ratings. (video below)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789Next »