About Me

Name: Katy Grimes
Email: fetchingjen@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama the User

Yesterday I wrote about bullies at work, and Democrat party bullies... a truly distasteful bunch.
 
Today, it's Users and specifically, Obama the User.
 
Waking up one day and realizing that you've been used by someone else is a disheartening feeling, even if it was only mild using. But being used is still being used, to any degree.
 
What will America do collectively when the Obama followers realized they've been royally used? I mean the biggest use of all uses. It's bad enough when someone uses you to get to someone else - a female friend used our friendship once to get to a guy  friend I worked with. Very distasteful. We are no longer friends.
 
Famous people get used all of the time for their rock star status and access to star treatment and riches. Groupies are users. People who can't make it on their own or are just too lazy to lift a finger are users. Unfortunately, if they put the energy into succeeding instead of scheming and scamming, they might be something.
 
Obama is using the people of America to grab the brass ring. He has no plans to follow up on any of his promises - he's just another narcissist who craves the public spotlight so badly, he'll say and do anything to occupy the greatest office in America. He's using his faithful flock. He cares more for the people he rubs shoulders with than for any of the regular people in middle America he's scamming.  
 
Obama is an elite. He values Europeans more than Americans. He apologizes for America and Americans wherever he goes, the way yur mom apologizes for the weird kid in your family. He blames the American people - the taxpaying American people - for what he perceives as American unpopularity around the world. He asks that Americans make more sacrifices - sacrifices that he is unwilling to make himself; driving an ugly tiny hybrid mini car, volunteering instead of taking a well-paying job, giving to charities, cutting back on our personal energy use in our homes, reduce your carbon footprint, do more with less - is Obama willing to do any of the things he's demanding that middle-America do? No. he lives in a big, beautiful home (that a criminal helped him lowball purchase), in the most beautiful part of Chicago, sends his kids to private schools and summer camps and music lessons, his wife accepted a very high paying job the moment he was elected Illinoois Senator, he doesn't volunteer his time or money to charities nor does his wife, they both went to Ivy League schools as part of  affirmative action - (neither was a stellar enough student to have earned admittance), they benefitted from student loans and grants and now whine about having to pay them back, they both are attractive, well coifed and fit, they have beautitul orthodontic teeth, and beautiful clothing.
 
What's to hate about the country that made all of this possible? Nothing unless you are a horrific snob and feel that you are better than or embarassed by people who go to public schools, or to the University of North Dakota or Oregon State, or work on your own farm, or own your own small manufacturing business, or waitress, or drive a cab or work at an airport. Michelle and Barrack Obama think that they are the only people, together with other elites, who should be able to make $500,000 a year, travel to Europe and stay in Villas, rub shoulders with Tony Kennedy in France, and attend think tanks. And the American taxpayers should pay for all of it.
 
The snobbery of the Democrat Elites is telling: it tells a tale of people who can afford to be socialists because they want to rise to power on the heavily taxed backs of the waitresses, farmers and business owners in America. They are selling their souls by using their faithful followers to gain the ultimate power - leader (and co-leader) of the free world. What users.
 
But who is more pathetic? The users or those who are willingly being used?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrat Bullies

Have you ever worked with someone who undermines you at every turn? Instead of working diligently at their own job, they do everything they can to make you look bad, or discredit your work, or get you in trouble with the boss?

I think we've all been exposed to this type of person; they gravitate to middle-management jobs and exercise power and control over rank and file employees - through cheating, lying, stealing. They are like a cancer in the organization; until the cancer is cut out, no one knows the extent of the damage done to people and/or the company.

The Democrats are this person. Instead of diligently working hard, they work only to undermine and discredit our country, and make us look bad, and do this through lying, cheating, and stealing for power, and control. The Democrats are just like the little workplace bully - insecure, obnoxious, rude, truth-challenged, self-absorbed, mean, self-aggrandizing little cheats who should be fired and denied unemployment benefits.

When backed up against a wall on specific issues, they lash out - call names, make personal attacks, try to hurt to disarm. Whether Democrats are on a neighborhood level, or running for national office, with few exceptions, they feel that whatever it takes is okay to get what they want - just like the middle-level power hungry manager, who will sacrifice an hourly employee, lie, cheat, and dish out personal attacks, to get what they want.

I know only a couple of Democrats who are not like this. Most however, will justify any behavior as a means to an end. Bullies. Cheaters. Mean, despicable behavior. What is this country coming to when these are the choices for leadership?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

From "The Entitlement Generation" to the "Look At Me" Generation

From ‘The Entitlement Generation’ to the ‘Look At Me’ Generation
Published: July 4, 2008

First, there were the Baby Boomers, the original “Me” generation (1946-1964). They produced the next “Me” generation: Generation X, also known as “The Entitlement Genera-tion” (1964-1984). Now, last century’s most self-absorbed generation have produced another “Me” generation, the “Look at Me” generation.

Why should we even care? Their kids are more self absorbed, self obsessed and desperate for attention than any previous people that ever walked the earth.

Don’t know what I am talking about? Open your eyes. The spoiled, hyper-sensitive, self-esteem children of the Baby Boomers are reproducing. The bratty, self-indulgent, spoiled and disloyal Gen Xers are now having kids. Today’s entertainment supports this, with YouTube videos, MySpace Web pages and “reality” TV shows where people act stupid, eat bugs, have sex and sing out of key in front of a camera and a live audience. When I was growing up in the 60s and 70s, there were no “reality” programs on TV. If you were stupid enough to make a fool of yourself in public, you went into hiding and prayed no one recognized you.

The “Me” generations of parents think that everything their kids do is worthy of a “wow” and a reward. Doing what used to be expected is exceptional today; eating one bite of dinner elicits clapping and immediate dessert. Getting in the car gets a high-five and a “good job.” Interrupting a conversation between adults by saying, “excuse me, excuse me, excuse me, excuse me” begets the child an excited “Thank you honey,” instead of a stern “shh.”

Parental guilt, shame and fear are driving today’s Gen X parents. Yet what do they have to be guilty about? Living well? Growing up spoiled? Spoiling themselves as adults? Today’s young parents fear responsibility; they deny themselves nothing, even if it means bankruptcy, because as children, they were denied nothing. They were never told that they could not have something because their parents couldn’t afford it—that would have been scandalous and shameful. Baby Boomer parents “afforded” whatever their kids wanted, resulting in resentment and guilt.

Sociologists have traced the “Me” phenomenon back to what they called the “self-esteem movement” that emerged in the 80s, asserting that the effort to build self-confidence has gone too far. Former Democratic Assemblyman John Vasconcellos established a task force on self-esteem and social responsibility in 1987 to get public funding for self-esteem research in California. He misguidedly thought that the state could “gift” self-esteem upon kids, instead of teaching them how to work for it. Consequently, the Self Esteem Police produced self-obsessed adults who resent authority.

Unfortunately, Gen X parents demonstrate that permissiveness is a component of their parenting style; most ignore the horrible behavior of their kids in public. When a correction is finally offered, it is over-analyzed and explained to the misbehaving child, instead of just saying “no.” More authoritative parenting and less indulgence in the child’s natural narcissistic behavior is called for; but that would require the Gen X parent to recognize that a parent’s primary duty is to raise a responsible and independent child.

Instead, Gen Xers have bad manners and think everyday is casual Friday. They whine incessantly, have contempt for authority, they show disrespect for elders and thrive on empty chatter about themselves in place of substantive communication.

A little advice to Gen X: Shave your stupid computer geek goatees, wash your greasy hair, replace the flip flops and skuzzy jeans with wrinkle-free appropriate work clothes and access some of that self-esteem you’re always whining about. Your kids are brats and so are you. Time to grow up—or we’ll cut off your allowance.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stand Up For America

With 4th of July tomorrow and families questioning whether they should purchase fireworks, this could be an opportunity instead to plan a patriotic celebration for kids and family.
 
The 4th of July, Independence Day is an excellent time to reflect on America's rich history and shut the liberal doom and gloomers up. When you stand up for America, you show what you are made of, you show the strangth this country was built on.
 
Today's convenient Americans buy in to everything America has to offer except American identity. Asian-Americans. African-Americans, Mexican-Americans, come to America, prosper, raise families and still shun calling themselves "American."
 
Teddy Roosevelt described this problem October 12, 1915: There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all.
This is just as true of the man who puts “native” before the hyphen as of the man who puts German or Irish or English or French before the hyphen. Americanism is a matter of the spirit and of the soul. Our allegiance must be purely to the United States. We must unsparingly condemn any man who holds any other allegiance.
 
The liberal left in America stand for nothing. They complain, they criticize, the try to tear down and destroy, but they stand for nothing.
 
Today's children are bombarded at school by liberal, anti-American teachers. These teachers rewrite history, and tell our children that America is evil, bad, a bully, arrogant and must be neutralized. Parents can combat this by making sure that our children know American history, and are proud of America.
 
Misery loves company, so the liberals drag innocent children into their web of deceipt. And since they stand for nothing, they are so emotionally invested in anger, misery and hatred, that they cannot pull out now.
 
If your kids watch television this weekend, watch the History Channel. Take a look at the Military channel. Read Lynn Cheney's books America : A Patriotic Primer and A Time for Freedom.
Study up on the Constitution. Read everything Theodore Roosevelt wrote. A great book is Theodore Rex by Edmund Morris. I am currently reading Mornings on Horseback: The Story of an Extraordinary Family, a Vanished Way of Life and the Unique Child Who Became Theodore Roosevelt by David McCullough.
 
We successfully raised two patriotic sons. One has chosen a military career. The other believes in the American free market and is in business with us. Both vote and are proud of their country. They grew up secure and proud to belong as Americans - they believe in America. 
 
Do you believe in this country? Because liberals don't believe in anything and don't stand up for America, they are insecure and fearful. Patriotism and nationalism allows us to feel confident and secure in our confidence in the goodness and strength of America. Stand up For America and you are standing up for you, your family, and your friends and neighbors.
 
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.
-Theodore Roosevelt
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Girly Men and Girly Sons

I have written a great deal about the feminization of America's boys. While Feminists have become more masculine with every passing year, men and boys have become wimpy, feminized and afraid of their own shadows.
 
About five years ago at a Boy Scout meeting for my son who had been recently promoted to Boy Scout from Weeblos, I looked around the room and shivered. I leaned over to my husband and whispered, "There's not a single male role model in this room." Shortly after that meeting, my son changed Boy Scout troops to another where men ran the troop - although many pushy mothers tried.
 
Between the teachers, pushy feminist mothers, lawyers and Hollywood depicting men as idiots, men have been relegated to the dufus  category and boys are cry babies. On the playground, boys can't play chase - someone might get hurt. Boys can't fight - someone might get hurt. They can't play on the monkey bars or jungle gyms, or play King of the Hill, or tackle soccer, or anything that might involve getting roughed up. Even in dodge ball, boys get in trouble for throwing the ball too hard at girls.
 
In 1st grade, my son was asked not to return to the snooty school he attended. I wondered what egregious act he might have committed to elicit such a strong, negative response from the school. The only answer I got from his teacher is that he got in trouble for being squirrly in the PE line. This was a female-dominated school, where natural boyish behavior was supressed and they were made to learn French. Obviously, it was a blessing that my son did not continue attending such a female dominated, effeminizing, snob school.  And today, he's at a Midshipman at the Naval Academy - manly stuff.
 
Feminists are miserable women - they want to dominate men, and then when they succeed at that, they hate the men they dominate. Feminists have become so masculine over the years, it's often difficult to differentiate between a "feminist" and a gender-bending woman. It used to be attractive to be feminine. Manly men liked us, and we where happy being pretty, wearing dresses and makeup, being good mommies and wives, and often managing work.
 
I heard a recent interview with columnist Kathleen Parker. Her new book, "Save The Males" is an accurate depiction of our anti-male culture and the ramifications. We are living the evidence.
 
In September 2006, I wrote The Selfish Pursuit of Feminism, and later turned it into a newspaper column here.
And in 2005, I wrote my first post on the Feminizing of Boys  here.
It's a problem, and a big one. A boy with a feminist mother does not have a chance; he's been terrorized for years. When he realizes who he is, he's already married to a demanding, pushy wife.
 
Parents must take charge of their boys and refuse to allow schools and female teachers to dictate medications and treatments that render them docile.
 
I'd like your thoughts and experiences. And if you wear socks with your sandals, don't bother.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Nip & Tuck Generation

Baby Boomers, the first of the self-absorbed generations - also called the "Me" generation, aren't aging well. I am a boomer, but at the very end of the group - sometimes called a "Tweener," between the Boomers and Gen X.
I thank GOD I was raised by a War generation father and not a Baby Boomer. Consequently, I have values that all don't involve my personal gratification and security.
 
The Boomers are obsessed with aging; most accurately, how it looks on them. It's not just women either; Baby Boomer men are having plastic surgery, going to tanning salons, getting their hair colored, getting Botox injections, waxing for hair removal, wearing invisible hearing aids, invisible braces, having vains stripped, getting manicures and pedicures, and shopping - like women.
 
Spare me. It's obnoxious enough that so many women are obsessed with their looks. I'm a little vain, I admit it. I get my hair highlighted. But other than expensive hair, I am pretty low maintenance - by choice. I don't get my nails and toes done, I don't wax or tan, or get skin peels, and I will never have plastic surgery, Botox injections or plumped up lip injections. I find it disgusting. It's a personal choice, I know. It's not how I want to spend my money. I prefer to focus on skin care, my health and fitness. I am aiming for being fit when I'm old. That's good looking.
 
All of this focus on "Me" by the "me generation," is not surprising however, the lengths to which they will go to keep youth, is. The money is usually a waste; you can usually tell if someone has had plastic surgery (not always), and for some people, it's such a boost for their self-esteem, that fixing a crooked nose or big ears or a turkey neck is understandable. Again, it's personal. But the men and women who get addicted to plastic surgery and constant "self-improvement," is tragic and sick. They never grew out of the "it's all about me" stage. The money spent on plastic surgery improvements should have been spent on good running shoes and a Therapist.
 
But it's the men I don't get... I don't think I'd like a guy who spends more time in front of the mirror than I do. The self-absorbed Baby Boomers take everything too far. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Moveon.org ad: Not My Son

The Wall Street Journal writes: "The political arms of MoveOn.org and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees are joining efforts to launch a new ad attacking John McCain on Iraq, hitting again on his earlier comment about committing a U.S. presence in Iraq for “100 years.”

The $540,000 ad will air in Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin and will be carried nationally on cable. The ad, “Not Alex,” is one of the highest tested ad buys MoveOn.org has run in recent years, said pollster Anna Greenberg, whose firm has tested the persuasiveness of roughly 50 ads by the group since 2004. “What we saw with this ad is people saw the message as straight-forward and clear, and the message was credible, and they largely agreed with what she was saying,” Greenberg said.

In the spot, a mother appears with her child and speaks directly to the camera. “Hi, John McCain, this is Alex, he’s my first. So far, his talents include trying any new food and chasing after our dog. That, and making my heart pound every time I look at him,” the mother says in the ad, “So, John McCain, when you said you would stay in Iraq for 100 years, were you counting on Alex? Because if you were, you can’t have him.”

The “100 years” charge has been hotly disputed by McCain and his supporters, who argue that his comments have been distorted by Democrats to suggest that he meant keeping combat forces in Iraq while he was referring to peace-keeping forces similar to what the U.S. currently has with other nations like South Korea.

The ad also pairs MoveOn.org, which backed Sen. Barack Obama, who clinched the Democratic nomination earlier this month, in the primary race, and AFSCME, which backed his rival, Sen. Hillary Clinton. “The ad and the collaboration indicates that progressive forces are coming together with the same objective,” said Paul Booth of AFSCME, noting that the union has not yet officially endorsed Obama."
 
This selfish liberal Gen X mother thinks it's okay that my son will fight in the Navy so that hers can grow up without a care in the world. She wants other people's kids to keep her son safe.
 
Who do liberals think keeps their freedoms alive? Who do they think fights for their constitutional rights to hate the military?
 
My son chose a military career because he is a patriot and wanted to serve America and not just his own interests. I think the mother in the ad has forgotten just how many Americans have fought to keep her safe.
 
And the decorated Vietnam Veteran running for President... He also fought for her right to sound like an spoiled, selfish, self-absorbed idiot in a moveon.org commercial. Be careful what you wish for liberals.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sneaky Senator Dodd

Communist Party hack Chris Dodd is up to it again. as long as he gets his low-cost mortgages, the little people can support Congresses spending crack habit:

Washington, DC - Hidden deep in Senator Christopher Dodd's 630-page Senate housing legislation is a sweeping provision that affects the privacy and operation of nearly all of America’s small businesses. The provision, which was added by the bill's managers without debate this week, would require the nation's payment systems to track, aggregate, and report information on nearly every electronic transaction to the federal government.

Call Congress and Tell Them to Oppose The eBay Reporting Provision in the Housing Bill: 1-866-928-3035

FreedomWorks Chairman Dick Armey commented: "This is a provision with astonishing reach, and it was slipped into the bill just this week. Not only does it affect nearly every credit card transaction in America, such as Visa, MasterCard, Discover, and American Express, but the bill specifically targets payment systems like eBay's PayPal, Amazon, and Google Checkout that are used by many small online businesses. The privacy implications for America's small businesses are breathtaking."

read the entire story here: freedomworks
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Am Ashamed of Michelle Obama's America

With Michelle Obama still defending her statements about "being proud of America for the first time in her life," I must say that with people like Michelle Obama rising to power, I've never been more ashamed of America. Conversley, up until recently, I've always been proud of my country.
 
With Liberals knowingly trying to defund the war in Iraq, handing out more government welfare, trying to take control of corporate oil companies, taking "windfall" profits from private business owners, increasing regulations on businesses, forcing business owners to provide company paid health insurance, voting to support gay marriage, allowing foreign terrorists access to our court system, Homeland Security employees terrorizing innocent Americans through airports, congress causing the rise in oil prices, congress refusing to address alternative energy exploration and drilling, unions runnning local elections, liberal-run schools not being able to graduate literate kids, 50% drop out rate in colleges the first year, affirmative action still being practiced in a state that voted to end it...
 
Must I keep going? These are all failed liberal programs, liberal ideas. With so many Americans abandoning the work ethic of our parents and grandparents, and instead, holding their hands out for freebies, I am ashamed of Michelle Obama's America.
 
While she is escorted around in limosines, wears designer clothing and jewelry, has makeup and hair stylists, whines about the cost of music lessons and summer camp, and tells regular Americans thast we need to work harder and not be so greedy...While Michelle Obama received a plush corporate job on the Board of a major hospital once her husband was elected to the Illinois senate, and tells tomorrow's college graduates to skip the corporate job and instead become a teacher or nurse, we need to remind each other of her words versus her how she lives.
 
Michelle Obama is as big of a hypocrite as is her husband. She's loving the fame, the fortune, the star treatment and status, but thinks that those of us who run businesses and work at 8-5 jobs should pay more taxes (because we are greedy), to support more welfare for those who don't work. She obviously isn't living in fear of her own tax status with her fame and wealth: she' got loopholes now and a bevy of lawyers and accountants to keep her taxes unnaturally low (think Theresa Heinz Kerry with her 5% tax rate). She's a phony and she's scary.
 
Michelle Obama makes me embarassed to have to share a national identity with her. She's militant, angry, and extremist and now she's the latest media darling. Who are the dummies that don't see Michelle and Barrack for the opportunistic phonies they are?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Next For the Cheating Congresswoman?

The paper I write for, The Sacramento Union, ran this story about the lyin', cheatin, scummy Congressoman. But who will prosecute her? Clearly, Laura Richardson is truth-challenged and has big ethics issues.
 
WASHINGTON (AP)
A watchdog group asked the House Ethics Committee on Wednesday to investigate U.S. Rep. Laura Richardson over her history of defaulting on home loans and other issues.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington wants the committee to determine whether the Long Beach Democrat received what amounted to an improper gift when Washington Mutual Inc. rescinded the foreclosure sale of one of her homes last month.

Richardson’s spokesman dismissed the complaint as “mean-spirited” and said the congresswoman already had initiated a meeting with a committee attorney.

The real estate investor who bought the Sacramento house at auction has sued Richardson and the savings and loan alleging the sale was proper. The sale is officially recorded in Sacramento County.

The buyer, James York, said Richardson received special treatment from Washington Mutual because she’s a congresswoman. Richardson has denied that, saying the 1,600-square-foot home she bought for $535,500 in January 2007 was sold into foreclosure without her knowledge and contrary to an agreement with Washington Mutual.

She had not paid the mortgage or property taxes on the house when it was sold in May.

Richardson also had two other homes in her Southern California district that have fallen into default six times.

The Long Beach Press-Telegram has reported that Richardson also has left car repair bills unpaid and failed to disclose certain financial details — including a loan from a strip club owner — when she served on the Long Beach City Council.

Moreover, even while falling behind in home payments last year, Richardson was lending herself $77,500 to finance her campaign in the contested special election congressional primary that she won in June 2007.
 
read the rest here: http://www.sacunion.com/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Happened To FLAG Day?

June 14th - every year - is Flag Day. But this year I heard nothing about it.
During the recent Memorial Day weekend, in Sacramento, CA our City Council allowed war protestors to line Capitol Mall with tiny red and white flags, signifying Iraqi deaths (implying "thanks to our military"). The one man who tried to add 200 of his own tiny American Flags was met with resistance - physical, he was yelled at and threatened, as well as city police telling him that he had to remove them at the end of the day. Thank you Mayor Fargo and Councilman Ray Trethaway. I plan on making sure the Sacramento residents don't forget who made this possible.
 
Over this past weekend, I heard nothing, and read nothing about Flag Day in Sacramento. It just passed without anyone acknowledging the special day.
 
Bernard J. Cigrand, a grade school teacher in Waubeka, Wisc., is credited with creating Flag Day in 1885. President Woodrow Wilson made the first official Flag Day proclamation in 1916. In 1949, President Harry Truman signed a bill into law designating June 14 of each year as National Flag Day.

 

In his Flag Day proclamation, President Bush wrote, "On Flag Day, we remember those in uniform whose courage and sacrifice inspire us here at home. We also remember the rich history of one of our oldest national symbols and reflect on our duty to carry our heritage of freedom into the future."
 
There were Flag Day observances planned for several cities in Southern California. But I heard nothing from our city.
 
Anaheim's Flag Day celebration, included free flags, cake and ice cream, music and entertainment. Sounded like fun.
 
In my city (run by self-absorbed, anti-American, anti-war liberals), there was no parade, no ice cream and no flags.
 
Flag Day was first observed in 1877 on the 100th anniversary of the Continental Congress' adoption of the Stars and Stripes as the official flag of the United States. In that year, Congress asked that all public buildings fly the flag on June 14. The idea quickly caught on and many people wanted to participate in waving the flag. One early supporter was B. J. Cigrand, a Wisconsin schoolteacher who wanted June 14 to be known as "Flag Birthday."

In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson proclaimed Flag Day as a national celebration. However, the holiday was not officially recognized until 1949 when President Harry Truman signed the National Flag Day Bill. In 1996, President Bill Clinton issued the following proclamation:

By The President
Of The
United States Of America

A Proclamation

There is no better symbol of our country's values and traditions than the Flag of the United States of America. Chosen by the Continental Congress in 1777, it continues to exemplify the profound commitment to freedom, equality, and opportunity made by our founders more than two centuries ago. Our flag's proud stars and stripes have long inspired our people, and its beautiful red, white, and blue design is known around the world as a beacon of liberty and justice.
 
Today, America's Flag graces classrooms, statehouses, courtrooms, and churches, serving as a daily reminder of this Nation's past accomplishments and ongoing dedication to safeguarding individual rights. The brave members of our Armed Forces carry "Old Glory" with them as they fulfill their mission to defend the blessings of democracy and peace across the globe; our banner flies from public buildings as a sign of our national community; and its folds drape the tombs of our distinguished dead. The Flag is a badge of honor to all -- a sign of our citizens' common purpose.
 
...Another reason to get rid of the communists running our city.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Employer Conundrum

I received the following email from a Labor Lawyer today: 

I-9 auditor says, ‘Most companies fail this test’

Using a four-step test, attorney Jim Velasco audits companies’ I-9 procedures to make sure they comply with government standards. Most companies fail the test.

When Velasco walks into a company, he asks four major questions - pretty much the same ones a government inspector will ask when investigating an I-9 violation: 

1. Do you have policies and procedures for verifying an employee’s identity, and are they in writing? Has top management signed off on them? At a minimum, the policies should adhere to the requirements outlined in Form M-274 Employer Handbook from the U.S Citizen and Immigration Services. 

2. Do you conduct awareness training for staff who deal with I-9s? And is the training documented? 

3. Do you conduct sample audits of verification documents, including the I-9 forms and supporting documents? You can do the audit with in-house staff or hire an audit professional. 

4. If you find problems with a sample audit, do you conduct a wider audit to see if the problems are widespread? 

Velasco, writing in the summer issue of “Relationships” magazine, says that besides failing the four-part test, 30% to 50% of the companies have compliance problems just with the I-9s themselves. 

A big reason to take the four steps: Besides uncovering mistakes, the procedure amounts to an excellent “good faith” defense - that you’ve given it your best shot to comply - if government investigators do uncover a violation.

And I wrote back:
this is all good information but I want to know why we can't verify the validity of applicants' documents with the government?
 
I used to be able to log onto the employer page on Homeland Security's website, and verify the citizenship of an applicant. Then one day it just locked me out. I've since read that it's no longer available - no explanation, nothing for employers to help us comply.
 
So now, I have to be a document expert, and when I identify a questionable document, no one from the government assists me with how to handle the situation. I can't hire the employee, nor can I not hire them for fear of discrimination. I tell them to go to their nearest social security office, but no one from the INS, Homeland Security, Social Security will talk to me, much offer help.
 
Instead, we employers are threatened with the ramifications for the improper care and keeping of our filing systems. Our "validity" is questioned, our businesses threatened, instead of the illegal alien with the phony documents.
 
Go figure.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Al Gore Is A Moron

Al Gore is a moron, and so are his followers. Who on earth thinks that anything he has to say is worthy of listening? He's a bloated windbag, short on brains, long on idiotic rhetoric, who thinks he's a messiah.
 
Yesterday the breathless media talking heads were all atwitter over the big announcement: "Al Gore throws his weight behind Obama." Well, there certainly is a lot of weight to throw about. Does that mean we now have to listen to Reverend Al Gore preach to us until the November election?
 
For a chuckle, visit Al Gore's website: Al Gore.com  Read his message to his followers begging for more money, this time for the Obama campaign. He's still bitter and will get even with President Bush one way or another. So now, he's going to follow the candidate of hope and change (is that climate change?). He's nothing but a connection to the past - most of us were tired of him after the Clinton years. now he's really long-in-the-tooth and a bigger hack.
 
Gore's a fraud and not a very good one. How embarassing for those sheeple who claim to still follow the windbag, Reverend Gore. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Supreme Court Social Engineering

While hundreds of gay couples get married all over California today, the majority of California's population is shaking it's collective head. While five of the Supreme Court Justices ignored the will of the people and instead, thrust their activist views into the forefront, the other four justices included their criticism of their colleagues in the decision. They agree with us that Judicial activism has indeed occured, and don't like it one bit.
 
Watching the evening news programs last evening, each couple interviewed by news shows claimed that they just wanted to be treated as regular people. That's funny, no one I've talked to says anything otherwise. We just want marriage between a man and a woman to remain the precious and unique institution it is. And most people will tell you that laws, legislation or Supreme Court rulings will not provide the approval for gay couples. Less than 1% of the population  is gay - not the 10% lie that the media likes to perpetuate. Approval is what gays are seeking; they are already legally covered with formalized unions. 
 
These same media and news programs ignored the opinions of the four justices who decented from the decision, but you can read it for yourself: Opinion. Their brilliant legal analysis is spot on.
 
The social engineering taking place in this country is the same phenomenon that brought down the Roman Empire. It took them a few thousand years - we may accomplish this in a few hundred.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MSM Lies - For Ratings

As if the MSM lying for ratings is news, but in this instance, it is. The story now is less about whether or not Michelle Obama made her racial slur on tape, but about who and how it was leaked to the media.
 
Michelle Malkin has been working to dispell the Bob Beckel-created rumor about Michelle Obama's alleged rant where she used the word "Whitey:" here/
 
Meanwhile, Rush Limbaugh is irritated about being accused by the MSM for starting the rumor: Drive-Bys Cast Rush as Villain in Nonexistent Michelle Obama Tape
 
Bob Becktel is a bomb-throwing, self-aggrandizing, publicity hound. We'll have to stay tuned to see what shakes out of this. I still thin the story is about Michelle Obama.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive