About Me

Name: Katy Grimes
Email: fetchingjen@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Barack Obama: Buyers Remorse

The Democrats are feeling buyers remorse for their nominee Barack Obama.
 
Never having been fully vetted or much of a record to speak of, the Obama fascade is beginning to crack.
 
Weak on every single issue, Obama's campaign has now resorted to attacks against John McCain. 
 
Barack Obama has failed every test: the economy, the war, our militray, foreign policy, abortion, criminal friends, his personal economics, whacko pastor, his wife, and the lies and daily flip flops.
 
For the guy who thinks he is a modern day Jesus Christ, his words bespeak the ultimate narcissit:
“...I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on earth. This was the moment -- this was the time -- when we came together to remake this great nation so that it may always reflect our very best selves and our highest ideals.”  Who writes this stuff?
 
Finally, voters seem to recognize the thin veneer Obama has tried to present as solid. He used to make women faint at events, now they are falling asleep.
 
Democrats have demonstrated that they aren't capable of putting up a respectable candidate: Carter, Mondale, Dukakis, Clinton, Gore, Kerry, and now Obama. Today, the Dems are clearly feeling buyers remorse as his veneer cracks right before their eyes.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Lies Roll Off His Tongue

Remember that old lawyer joke?
 
Q: How can you tell when a lawyer is lying?
A: His mouth is moving.
 
Barack Obama is quickly falling into "lawyer" category for telling lies. They just roll off his tongue.
 
There was Reverend Wright and the issue of his kooky, radical black liberation church.
Then the Bill Ayers issue.
And the Tony Rezko issue.
And Obama lied and claimed that he introduced and helped get passed legislation to make it mandatory for even small nuclear leaks to be reported quickly to state and local authorities. That legislation didn’t actually pass and become law. He lied about two things: his support for legislation to help police the nuclear power plant industry and his ability to pass legislation.
 
And then the Saddleback Church debate. Obama told a few juicy lies the other night leaving himself only one option: Lying his way out  - again. It seems the candidate of change is only a chameleon who changes his colors when it helps him save his skin.
 
He lied about having to vote on the Iraq war.
 
He lied about being involved in Campaign Finance reform with John McCain. He instead quickly jumped back across the aisle and voted with his party... after getting out some harsh words at his "friend" McCain.
 
Obama lied about his vote while still in the Illinois State Senate against the “Born-Alive Infants Protection Act” (BAIPA) bill twice in committee and once on the Senate floor.
 
And he lied about the number of abortions taking place since President Bush has been in office... they have not gone up as he said, but have gone down.
 
Obama lies about not playing the race card - it's the only card he has and uses with regularity.
 
Obama lies about his willingness to debate McCain - anytime, anywhere. His campaign refuses all offers.
 
He lies about McCain making fun of his name and his race. McCain has never said a word about Obama's race or his name. 
 
He lied about his Uncle being among one of the first American troops to liberate Auschwitz. The Soviets did.
 
Obama lied about how his mother and father met. He claimed they net during a march in Selma. Lie.
 
He lied about his grandfather: claimed he signed up for WWll the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed and fought in Patton's army. (He actually enlisted 6 months later).
 
Obama lied about his father being a poor goatherder... father came from an affluent, successful, educated family.
 
Obama lied about his father being connected to a "Kennedy airlift," for that all-important "Kennedy" connection.
 
He lied about having "foreign" experience. Living on foreign soil does not constitute "experience."
 
He lied about "not running" for President and instead fulfilling his full senate term. Onnly 143 days into his Senate term, he announced.
 
Obama has told so many lies and half-truths, that he obviously can't keep track of what's real and what is his fantasy.
 
Politicians don't exactly have a great track record for the truth. Most beef-up their experience and involvement in specific projects, often taking all of the credit. But Barack Obama is such an accomplished liar, that he told several whoppers on live television in a church last Saturday - all lies that were easily disputed.
 
It's a good thing Obama believes in himself and his vast "experience," because not many other people do. Why tell lies if the truth will do all of your speaking?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Olympic Relevance - Or Not?

The Olympics are making me choke, more so this year than any previous. 

The feel-good hype leading up to this years' Summer Olympics in Communist China started it. Why wasn't anyone on NBC, CBS or ABC asking what the heck we were doing participating in the Olympics in Communist China and acting as if it was normal? 

And then the opening ceremony, which resembled the Red Army in costume, "flawlessly" took place. Oh how the network anchors were flustered and giddy with the flawless performances by 500,000 Chinese citizens, forced to beat drums as directions were given in tiny earpieces embedded in their cochlea. 

And then the "games" began. Only the "games" really began 12 years ago when the Olympic Committee accepted the inevitable bribes from the ChiComs to agree to Beijing for the 2008 Olympics. The games we are watching - the competition and sporting events - are secondary to the personal lives of the athletes.

Today's Olympic athletes are professional athletes. They used to be amateurs. Today's athletes all live in America while representing their "homeland," usually somewhere in Eastern Europe. Today's athletes have big sponsors who pay supply the very expensive gear and equipment. Even swimmers, who used to only need goggles, a speedo and swim cap, now wear $550 "swimsuits" engineered by NASA. 

During my childhood and teens, I was a swimmer. I had green hair, tan skin and a big back. In high school, I swam three practices each day and competed on two teams. I was never olympic material (far from it), but I could have gotten a college scholarship had I chosen to stay with it. Swimming was not an expensive sport other than the gallons of hair conditioner I had to buy to keep the green to a minimum. Swimming on the teams was very social as well. Most of my friends were swimmers - even recreationally in summer leagues. But no one other than a few obviously exceptional athletes, thought about scholarships or dare I say, the Olympics. Sports were fun and a way to stay busy.

Today, kids' sports are not so fun.

Today most very young athletes are pushed to compete. Coaches and parents treat young athletes as if they are the next Tiger Woods. It's all about the scholarships, sponsorships and endorsements - irresistible to fame seeking parents.  

Olympic athletes have always represented a different life to the average person. Their dedication, superior skill and talent and supportive families and/or parent coaches far exceed what most people have in them. Tiny little child gymnasts who don't live with their families have always made us wince, as have young skiers who live away at Boarding Schools in the Alps, and of course, the Russians and Chinese athletes who are raised for the sole purpose of representing their countries athletically. 

The Olympics has become a big financial joke. Michael Phelps is a phenomenon, but what about his engineered swimsuit? How will his raw talent be measured against engineering? And who is paying for all of his expensive equipment? 

As I watched diving the other day, the choking started. The female announcer, obviously a former diver, fell all over herself - and the Chinese divers - while critiquing the competition. She was positively gooey about the Chinese divers only. The Australian divers were fantastic, but only because they had a Chinese coach, according to the announcer. 

The pandering taking place with the Chinese this year is taking any remaining fun out of the Olympics. While I know that the ChiComs can just whimsically cut off our broadcasting transmissions should we irritate them, shouldn't the athletics at least receive fair and commentary worthy of sportsmen? Yes, the Chinese athletes excel in some sports. But then again, knowing they have no choice as children once their destiny is decided, takes the athleticism out of the equation. Every golfer could be a Tiger Woods if forced to golf 10 hours a day, 365 days a year.

The Olympics has become as relevant as the United Nations. America should protest any further participation as long as rogue communist countries pretend they give a whit about any of the people participating. The Chinese have not flawlessly executed this dive, and our liberal media cannot make it so, just by pandering and feeling good about the people. It's too bad that the media doesn't recognize that we care more for the Chinese people than their own country. 

I give them a 5.5 on execution, a 4.0 on technique and a 4.5 on degree of difficulty.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Walking Eagle

'Walking Eagle' Senator BARACK OBAMA was invited to address a major gathering of the American Indian Nation two weeks ago in upstate New York . HE spoke for almost an hour on HIS future plans for increasing every Native American's present standard of living, should HE one day become the President. HE referred to his career as a Senator, how he had signed 'YES' for every Indian issue that came to his desk for approval. Although the Senator was vague on the details of his plan, he seemed most enthusiastic about his future ideas for helping his 'red sisters and brothers'.

At the conclusion of his speech, the Tribes presented the Senator with a plaque inscribed with his new Indian name - Walking Eagle. The proud Senator then departed in his motorcade, waving to the crowds.

A news reporter later inquired to the group of chiefs of how they came to select the new name had given to the Senator. They explained that Walking Eagle is the name given to a bird so full of sh*t it can no longer fly.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Black Politics or Just Liberal Politics?

This is probably one of the most relevant columns I have read recently. Star Parker hits it out of the park. It's a must-read. Pass it on, please.
******
Black Politics? You mean liberal politics
by Star Parker

A feature story in this week's New York Times Magazine asks, "Is Obama the End of Black Politics?"

This in the wake of a full week of TV talking heads asking if presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama played the "race card" in his response to John McCain's Obama "celebrity" ads. And an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal by black journalist Juan Williams saying "The Race Issue Isn't Going Away."

Williams is right. The race issue isn't going away. And the New York Times feature, which profiles new young black politicians around the nation -- like Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick, Newark, N.J., mayor Corey Booker, and Philadelphia mayor Michael Nutter -- sheds little light on the issue in what it says.

More revealing about the Times piece is what it doesn't say.

The Times reporter never found it relevant to note that every black politician he spoke to is a Democrat. Nor did he see a need to talk to a single black conservative.

It's not like black conservatives have nothing to say here. Hoover Institution scholar Shelby Steele wrote a book about Obama. Tom Sowell has regularly written about him, as have I.

But black conservatives are not considered relevant to these discussions because race is not an issue of ethnicity but an issue of politics. Black politics means liberal politics and hence black conservatives are not black.

read the rest  HERE
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

State Senator Wigs Out

read this disturbing story courtesy of the Capitol Resource Institute:

Displaying shocking contempt for the people she was elected to serve, last week Democrat Senator Pat Wiggins hurled profanity at a pastor during his committee hearing testimony.

Pastor Robert Jones of Oak Park United Methodist Church was attending an informational hearing on California cutting global warming emissions when the verbal assault occurred.

During his testimony, Jones pointed out that when government imposes mandates and taxes to combat global warming, it hurts the poor and most vulnerable in our communities. Less than two minutes into his testimony, Senator Wiggins interrupted by exclaiming, "Excuse me, but I think your arguments are bull----."

Stunned by such vulgar language and indecorous behavior, Pastor Jones had no response.

In the video Senator Wiggins is heard but not seen. Immediately after Senator Wiggins's attack, chairwoman Senator Christine Kehoe jumps in to cover for her colleague's crass behavior.

Video of the disturbing and vile attack is available on YouTube

"This type of behavior from an elected official is simply unacceptable," stated Karen England, executive director for Capitol Resource Institute. "But this is the attitude that many in the majority party have towards the 'little people' who come to Sacramento to participate in the legislative process. Even when our staff is belittled publicly by arrogant lawmakers, we have never been cursed at; this is beyond the pale."

"The legislative process is supposed to encourage citizen involvement and input," stated Meredith Turney, legislative liaison for Capitol Resource Institute. "Treating citizens with such disdain-by crudely attacking them for sharing their opinion-will enforce the public belief that many elected officials are elitists who could care less about their constituents."

"Who does Senator Wiggins serve?" asked LaTanya Wright, Capitol Resource Institute staff member. "Her despicable behavior shows her contempt for her employers-the people of California! Senator Wiggins should be ashamed of her outrageous outburst and we demand a public apology to Pastor Jones. This was a public attack and it deserves a public apology."

Call Senator Wiggins and tell her to publicly apologize to Pastor Robert Jones and the people of California: (916) 651-4002.
*************
Very disturbing behavior from a "professional" politician. Call her office and share a few of your own adjectives with her.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hello and Goodbye

I just returned home from one week in Kauai with my husband and son. We have been planning this trip since last December as a kind of reward to our son for completing his first year at the Naval Academy. He only had a few weeks off this summer. While all of his friends were coming home from college for the entire summer, he was on a training exercise on YP boats, and then on a submarine somewhere in the pacific ocean experiencing his first "Summer Cruise."
 
Our Kauai trip was wonderful and true "R&R." We are tanned and rested and now back at work. Our son is now looking forward to his second year at the academy, free from the restrictions of being a first year "Plebe."
 
As difficult as it always is to let him go, nothing will ever compare with Induction Day last year, when we left him at the Naval Academy for the beginning of "Plebe Summer." Later this week, we will take him to the airport and not see him again until either we travel back east this fall, or wait until Thanksgiving when he comes home. We are fortunate to have had a few weeks together this summer. I got to be a mom, and he got to be my kid again. But on Saturday, he will put his uniform back on, stand a little straighter and taller, and immediately get back into academy mode. Our communications will be by email and short phone calls. My house will be quiet and tidy again.  However, I've learned to love the mess for all it stands for.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Man/Woman Debate

Men and women used to have very specific roles in their own households as well as society. And while women did not have the right to vote, women had very specific jobs and expectations.

Knowing the differences in men and women, regardless of vociferous the 20th century women's rights groups and the rise of women who wish they were men, women had a very important place in families and society - even "working" women did.

In the Victorian era, women were very important to the successful running of families. Their jobs included planning menus, the entire social calendar of the family,  the decorating and running of the house, the social season agenda, the mixing and successful marital arrangements. It sounds trivial when described this way today, but are we so different?

Today's wives and mothers are really responsible for all of the usual tasks and more; women must hold a job outside the home as well. It's no wonder women are acting out like toddlers today. Women are stressed out and confused with their roles.  It is no longer acceptable to just be a wife and mother, or so many women project. Women today are expected by other women to juggle "careers," have children, be world-renowned chefs, superb housekeepers and decorators, keepers of the social calendar as well as subtle guidance counselors and matchmakers to their children. 

Ridiculous. Why is it that women needed what men have and more? Thanks to the feminists, women are so stressed out that the offspring are suffering, as is the future of society. Today's kids are as confused as their mothers. Men do not know which way is up - are they men or are they women with their waxings, men's pedicures, hair colorings and Botox injections for puffy eyes. The roles have been reversed in some couples, with women "wearing the pants," and men questioning their manhood.

What will it take to bring society back to the natural roles of women and men. I am the first to admit that I would have fought for the right for women to vote and have a voice. Women obviously needed a voice, and in good families, they had one. But with certain families, women were to be seen and not heard. Today, women are not equal to men, we are ruling everything but not because we have earned the right. Women are ruling everything because men are afraid, legally. When the pendulum swings so far to one direction, it must swing back naturally. 

I am waiting for the day when the pendulum is balanced; when men have their rightful and natural place as the masculine head of the family. Men naturally want to protect women and children, and fight for us. Women naturally want to protect and nurture husbands and children. Women care about ambience and decorations, food, music, art, literature and the like. Our men want desperately to shelter us from evil. What's wrong with appreciating the differences between the sexes instead of turning women into men and men into women?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal's New "Big Brother"

The irony about the liberal paranoia with the U.S. Government, is it is just that - paranoia... and projection, which the liberals are very good at. The old joke about how you can tell if a lawyer is telling a lie... because his mouth is moving, is really about liberals. Everything they claim to abhor, is what they do.

And now, the new Big Brother, is the liberal media. The censorship they practice is staggering. on Friday August 1st, Nancy Pelosi shut off the lights and cameras in congress, and prevented Republicans from speaking about real energy reform - on the record. They continued to speak about what to do about gas prices, etc..., but Pelosi was already home, as were all of the Democrats. How's that for effective censorship?

Democrats in every city in America, complain about the environment, and then accept the blatant bribes from developers. It is always under Democrats that development expands exponentially.  Why? Because they make so much money from it?

I am currently on a beautiful island in one of the Hawaiian Islands, more commonly known as the Garden Isle. I've been coming here for a couple of decades. Today, what was  very recently beautiful vast green expanse of supposedly protected lands, is now new housing developments in progress. Locals grumble about the local politicians selling out - a problem in every city in America. Unfortunately, liberals think nothing about grabbing at their personal opportunity, and throwing their campaign promises out the window, very quickly. The Republicans who try this are usually thrown out of office - Democrats are reelected. Aren't they supposed to be environmentalists? 

Liberal environmentalists are the same ones who run the Sierra Club and the Nature Conservancy and lease out thousands of acres to oil companies... revenue looks good whatever the political affiliation I guess. What would their faithful followers say?

Voters are getting pretty tired of this practice. We don't care what the party affiliation is, but yes, it is primarily liberals who will say and do anything to get elected, and then do exactly what they planned on ahead of time for the "donors." 

And while this sleaze is taking place with elected officials, the new "Big Brother" is covering for the liberals every step of the way. It doesn't matter if it's money in the freezer, or a young mistress on the payroll,  or a sex scandal, or even a government cover up; the liberal media covers for liberals. Otherwise, Barack Obama or John Kerry or Al Gore would never have made it as far as they did - each guy was either a liar, a criminal, or incompetent - or any combination.

Big Brother is alive and well and doesn't look like Uncle Sam. The liberal media is corrupt and obvious. And fortunately, most Americans don't fall for it. Thus we had two terms of Bush/Cheney - in spite of their censorship, manipulations and lies, and a media who tried to throw elections.

We are experiencing it again with the idiotic candidacy of Barack Obama - the most unqualified candidate ever to make it this far. It is sad that more money is spent by the media on marketing and manipulating American voters, than just reporting the news and letting voters decide, intelligently.  

That should tell you everything you need to know - liberals think they are smarter than the rest of us, and will go to any extreme to get their way. Lying and cheating is justifiable to them.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama The Bad Date

Barack Obama, man of the people, is like a bad date. He flirts relentlessly in class until you agree to go out with him. Then on the first date, after arriving 45 minutes late, he talks endlessly about himself. He winks at himself in the mirrors and windows as he passes, he talks at you while looking around the room to see who may be watching him, and when you finally dance, he's totally into himself, dancing solo like a well-rehearsed audition. When it gets too late and he's still dancing alone on the dance floor while you watch the time, you finally catch his eye and point to your watch. At the door after a quiet ride home, he raises an expectant eyebrow, which he is sure will charm you into letting him come in for a tryst.   This guy just won't go away. And because he is so into himself, he does not pick up on any of your signals.

Pretty Boy Barack has been dreaming of residing in the White House for a long time. But as his past begins to finally seep out, we find that he's even more of a pretty shell than we originally thought. Inexperience is one issue, but this guy is not just inexperienced, he thinks he deserves the job. It's his entitlement. It's his birth right. After all, he's been planning on this for many years, so it must be his. He's done all of the right things (according to his resume) and met all of the right people. He uses the right vanilla vocabulary words and had his teeth whitened.

It's no different than people who try to sneak into the long line at the movies. They are cheaters. They think they shouldn't have to wait with all of the other plebes, lowlife and rank and file. 

Barack Obama is a pompous gasbag who likes the sound of his own voice. We know this because of the way he changes his accent when he's on a roll in a prepared speech. Instead of using proper diction, he gets this little preacher thing going... drops consonants, starts to sound reverent and bombastic. Hillary did the same thing depending on the audience; she tried a southern drawl, toned up her Midwest  accent and even turned on that East Coast blue blood thing. However, I am not sure even she could like the sound of her own voice. Obama is not the speaker he thinks he is; lack of sincerity comes through regardless of the accent, between the thousands of "ummms."

Obama is a nightmare and not just because he is like a bad date. He's a total phony as is wife Michelle. They crave the power of the Presidency. She comes off as a very condescending and pushy wife, who marginalizes Barack every chance she gets publicly. Their constant attempts to appear "regular" and "normal" to People Magazine and The View hosts are embarrassing. The shameless prostitution of their kids demonstrates just how desperate they are. They are so clueless and so out of touch with what is "normal," that each additional attempt looks careless and desperate. But the arugula, violin lessons, expensive summer camps and $600 earings keep coming through. Elitism is tough to hide for very long.

For Barack to presume the Presidency is his already is not only in bad taste, bad protocol and bad politics (we already have a President), he is demonstrating what bad judgment he uses. 

Barack Obama is wearing thin as does anyone who is a phony. But you'd think that after 8 years of the Clinton's and their insincerity, power mongering and abuse of the Presidency, Americans would remember how bad it got. 
If Obama is elected President by the stupids of America, he will poop in his own nest. He's already stepping in it. the mass media cannot cover up all of his gaffes and idiotic moves, but will enough of the sane people vote to put him in his place?

He's a bad date who thinks everyone is in love with him. He thinks we should all feel grateful to him and are lucky that he is considering the Presidency. And as with a bad date, even if you tell him to jump off a cliff, he thinks you are having a bad day. Because it's all about him... as he winks at his reflection and gives himself the Clint Eastwood two-shot. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Proud Citizen Of The World

Townhall columnist Star Parker wrote a fabulous column today that is a must read for anyone closely following this Presidential election.  I am growing weary of hearing about Obama's "Black America," "Hispanic America," and of course, "White America." For a guy who said that race doesn't matter, he sure has made it a hallmark of his entire campaign.

Star Parker: The headline on the website of German magazine Der Spiegel about Barack Obama's speech in Berlin: "Huge Crowds Left with Mixed Feelings."

Two hundred thousand turned out for the speech, but CNN's Candy Crowley reported an "absence of euphoria" at the event.

As Senator Obama went global with "Yes, we can" and "Change we can believe in" he left at least some of the horde in Berlin scratching their heads. Perhaps these Germans, out to hear what all the excitement was about, were looking for leadership and substance rather than kumbaya.

What they got was the global version of "There is not a White America and a Black America and Latino America and Asian American America -- there is the United States of America."

Obama spoke not just as a "proud citizen of the United States but a fellow citizen of the world."
Read the rest of her column here
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Abuse in Wicked Hands"

My column from the Sacramento Union, Friday July 25, 2008
 
‘Abuse in Wicked Hands’
Published: July 23, 2008

I strongly urge each member of the Sacramento City Council to read “The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson.” The wisdom and foresight in Jefferson’s writings should be mandatory training material for ambitious local politicians. Jefferson correctly declared, “Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms [of government] those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.”

Sacramento’s elected officials spend most of their time worrying about getting re-elected and keeping power, making them the best example of power perverted into tyranny. Their focus is personal, and not for the good of the public they serve.

Members of the City Council have been recently quoted saying that our city budget deficit is the result of “the downturn in the economy.” Hogwash. The city of Sacramento has a spending problem, starting with Mayor Heather Fargo and the City Council. They long ago tossed out the books about citizen representation, and penned their own: “The Joy of Political Power and The Pleasures of Ambition and Omnipotence.” They are currently working on “Dodging Accountability in Ten Easy Steps.”

Custodian of Public Trust
Thomas Jefferson believed that “Democracy would cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work, and give to those who would not.”

Today’s “leaders” see themselves as God-like, selflessly giving to the masses. What they are really “giving” is not of themselves but an endless supply of costly freebies, welfare and entitlements—food stamps, free rent, bus passes, “job training,” daycare, education, houses, medical care, don’t forget citizenship, rights, power, privilege, benefits and favors. With the numerous giveaways under the auspices of devotion to the welfare of others, our politicians are only plumping up their own ambitions and circumstances. By creating the dependence of citizens, politicians get subservience and submissiveness in return, but it completely kills morality and ethical conduct.

Jefferson predicted “future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”

The allure of power to those who seek it is intoxicating. However, it is best to remember that it is not power that is alluring to pure minds. The idea of serving the people is lost on those who seek power such as our City Council and Mayor Fargo.

Whenever a man has cast a longing eye on offices, a rottenness begins in his conduct. Thomas Jefferson knew men who abused their political positions; he did not know that it would become a way of political life in America. The Sacramento City Council members are such an example: They use politics as a vocation, living off and profiting from politics, rather than being genuinely politically active—they are the very definition of weak people who abuse trust and power and cannot stand on their own.

Only with the silence of good people will tyranny and corruption continue. Jefferson’s wisdom rings true even today: When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's "Tour of Duty"

Yes, you heard correctly: "Obama's Tour of Duty." The liberal news media has single-handedly solved Barrack Obama's lack of military service: They have dubbed his current Middle East travels a "Tour of Duty."
 
Last night on NBC Nightly News, anchor Lester Holt referred to Obama's trip as his "Tour of duty," as if this is real military service: newsbusters has this.
 
... Ironic word choice for the candidate who has opposed the Iraq was, said teh surge would not work, wants to immeeiately withdraw our troops, and is now flip flopping and hedging.  Will John McCain object and talk about his real Tour of Duty as well as the tours of duty of the real soldiers fighting for democracy and freedom in Iraq and Afghanistan?
 
The three queasy networks sent along their top anchors to join Obama on his vacation to Europe and the Middle East. The desperation being shown by the media to get Obama elected is unbelievable. It appears they all get "thrills up their legs" when he speaks...(chrismatthews gets chills and thrills) 
 
Obama's trip should be called a "Tour of Doody..." 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Buck Up

Last week I wrote a column that has really angered a great number of "Generation X" readers. Frankly, it should have angered even more.
 

First, there were the Baby Boomers, the original “Me” generation (1946-1964). They produced the next “Me” generation: Generation X, also known as “The Entitlement Genera-tion” (1964-1984). Now, last century’s most self-absorbed generation have produced another “Me” generation, the “Look at Me” generation.

Why should we even care? Their kids are more self absorbed, self obsessed and desperate for attention than any previous people that ever walked the earth.

Don’t know what I am talking about? Open your eyes. The spoiled, hyper-sensitive, self-esteem children of the Baby Boomers are reproducing. The bratty, self-indulgent, spoiled and disloyal Gen Xers are now having kids. Today’s entertainment supports this, with YouTube videos, MySpace Web pages and “reality” TV shows where people act stupid, eat bugs, have sex and sing out of key in front of a camera and a live audience. When I was growing up in the 60s and 70s, there were no “reality” programs on TV. If you were stupid enough to make a fool of yourself in public, you went into hiding and prayed no one recognized you.

The “Me” generations of parents think that everything their kids do is worthy of a “wow” and a reward. Doing what used to be expected is exceptional today; eating one bite of dinner elicits clapping and immediate dessert. Getting in the car gets a high-five and a “good job.” Interrupting a conversation between adults by saying, “excuse me, excuse me, excuse me, excuse me” begets the child an excited “Thank you honey,” instead of a stern “shhh.”  (read the rest of the column here)
********
 
The angry comments and letters in response to this column were... well... wimpering, emotional, whiny diatribes from Gen X'rs. I did however, receive a few letters from older people (over the age of 40) who agreed with the column, as evidenced by their own children and grandchildren. Ouch.
 
First, here are the comments from the SacUnion website:
 
So are you two related, or the same person?

Very amusing that you ask the point of the article, then illustrate it nicely in your response
While you are correct in many of your perceptions of the boomers and Xers, it appears to me that you may be just as much of a whiner as they are. Instead of pointing out the flaws of those of us trying to deal with our predecessors' failures, offer a solution. Cleaning up appearances and going to work is narrow minded. People who pass judgement without empathy for the state of the world today (which you created) make it easier for the Xers to reject your "entitlement" to a secure future.
So what exactly was the point of your article? Was it just to point a judgemental finger at Gen X and to complain about our "narcism"? Last time I checked my generation was the backbone of fighting men and women in Iraq. My generation will be the first to have a lower standard of living , will face economic insovlvency, lack of healthcare, outsourced jobs, college so expensive that most of us have given up on finishing it and a lack of positve role models to base our behavior on.

Next, here is one young fellow's letter:
 
Ms. Grimes,

 

Re: your article entitled "From the Entitlement Generation to the Look at Me Generation", SacUnion July 4, 2008

I disliked this article, not just because it was a one-person rant against an entire generation of Americans, but more because it was a factual and logical mess. Rather than list point by point my problems with the article, let me summarize as best I can. I'm a Gen Xer, born 1973 (Gen X is largely considered kids born between 1965-1982, also the baby bust, as there are so few of us), children of primarily early boomers and also the beat generation. Generation X has often been called the "Slacker Generation", but never the "Entitlement Generation", which is also known as Gen Y and the echo-boom(roughly 1982-1995), mostly comprised of children of later Baby Boomers. Gen X's kids, to the extent they're born yet, are generally still in their early school years. Your concerns seem to relate to Gen Y, the kids in their late teens and 20s, the Lindsey Lohan, Girls Gone Wild crowd (I have similar problems with this generation as you do--which is why it frustrates me that you got your dates and labels all wrong). So you spend the bulk of your article wrongly singling out Gen X, falsely criticizing their parenting of a generation of kids they didn't raise, and making lame 15 year old references to our "goatees." Sorry, "Reality Bites" came out 13 years ago, and I think even Ethan Hawke's goatee is gone now (for reference purposes, Mr Hawke was born in 1970 and his 2 children are 10 and 6 years old). Even your specific criticisms (such as current TV programs, which are produced by Baby Boomers, self esteem movements of the 80s, which were created by Baby Boomers) don't relate to us. Here's how Time Magazine described Gen Xers:

"They possess only a hazy sense of their own identity but a monumental preoccupation with all the problems the preceding generation will leave for them to fix . . who fall between the famous baby boomers and the boomlet of children the baby boomers are producing...By and large, the [Gen X] group scornfully rejects the habits and values of the baby boomers, viewing that group as self-centered, fickle and impractical. While the baby boomers had a placid childhood in the 1950s, which helped inspire them to start their revolution, [this] generation grew up in a time of drugs, divorce and economic strain. . .They feel influenced and changed by the social problems they see as their inheritance: racial strife, homelessness, AIDS, fractured families and federal deficits"

Seems like a decent target audience for the Sac Union, the frustrated younger adults who enjoyed the Reagan years and hate the 60s, but so much for that, then. While it is classic Baby Boomer behavior to blame your children for the world the Baby Boomers largely ruined and still control, is it too much to ask that at least you make a coherent argument and do a little factual research to support it? Even if your criticisms had been correctly leveled against Gen Y, logically much of the blame for these kids' behavior should fall squarely on the parents who set absolutely no boundaries for them. And that would be...well, yes, those Baby Boomers again. My experience has been that Gen X, which included the first large numbers of latchkey kids and children of divorces, cares a great deal that we don't raise our children in the amoral directionless way that many of our parents did, and looks to our grandparents for inspiration. We take marriage much more seriously, and tend to wait to have children until we're ready to care for them. Too bad there may not be enough of us to make a difference. Thanks for the kick in the ribs anyway, hope it made you feel better.

Sincerely,

Joel Erb
Sacramento, California
 
and here is another interesting piece:

Ms Grimes,

 Well your article seems to have triggered a good debate.  I'm hoping I can appeal to your sense of fairness and decency as I ask you two questions.  I know your time is valuable so I'll keep this short.

#1.  The level of anger in the tone of your op-ed piece and in Dennis Johnson's email as truly surprised me.  Why are successful, white upper class members of our culture so fearful of decenting ideas or observations that they lash out in such negative ways?   I see so much anger and fear leveled at the world by Boomers.  This anxiety diminishes your valid point that there is an "entitlement" attitude amongst Gen X.  I agree with you that many of my generation suffer from a lack patients and an appitite for things not earned.  But there is no deeper digging into what creates this mindset.   Which brings me to my second question,

#2.  Why shouldn't Xers think that they deserve things right now?  Though this is a morally inexcusable mindset it is the pervaiding mindset of the most of the people in our country.  Look at the level of personal debt individuals carry in this country.   The Instant Gratification Fix is like a drug that our civilization is addicted to.  Bigger homes with bigger cars with bigger TV's and it goes on and on.  Your generation's seeming inabilty to stop and figure out that freedom and fulfillment don't come from buying power or consumption has delivered all of you guys into unhappiness. Being aware that you are a loved and unique Human Being and that we all are connected has always been the path to personal and collective peace.  This view is essentailly the Christian worldview minus the Diety requirement.

 My generation has a host of problems and I myself take pride in pointing out our flaws, addressing them and solving them.  But pointing out problems is not whining, it is seeing structural flaws in our culture and fixing them.  A disease cannot be cured if it is not pointed out, observed and altered.  The healing and understanding that needs to take place has to happen hand in hand with between our generations.  I say lets set aside acromony and fix OUR problems.  Are you on board for that? 

I'm hoping at some level what I've said makes sense and I look forward to you offering solid, empathetic soltuions to our disagreements.

Ken Willis      
 
Mr. Willis's letter was a follow up to one that he sent to the Editor at The Sacramento Union, that I and another reader responded to.

I Agree with Grimes

Re: “Shocked by Grimes” by letter writer Ken Willis; published July 11, 2008 in The Union.

Editor: I agree with Katy. Ken Willis on the other hand did not; he professed to be “speechless” (too bad he was not), but then goes on a whiny tirade about his generation being the first to have a lower standard of living than the previous due to the uncontrolled consumerism of the Boomers, having fewer opportunities at decent employment due to outsourcing, unaffordable healthcare, dwindling energy supplies and the fact that they will never have a chance at retirement. His crystal ball seems to be a bit gloomy. When Katy called them lazy and whiny, she forgot quitters. I have interviewed many of Mr. Willis’ generation for jobs. A lot think that they are God’s gift to the working world because they have been told how wonderful they are (and believe it) their whole life. Many DO feel entitled and do not think that they have to pay their dues like the rest of us did. They want the BMW, the corner office, the VP title and they want it NOW! As for the consumerism of my generation (the Boomers), it was NOT my generation that got us into the sub-prime mess. It was not my generation that wanted the biggest and the best house right away (despite not having the money to pay for it). Unlike Mr. Willis, I do not talk about those of my generation who served; I served in the Marines myself and did a tour in Vietnam. I got out of the Marines, went to college and worked my way up in this world. Actions speak louder than words. So, is Mr. Willis going to continue to complain about what he does not have and what he cannot do (and continue to make Katy’s point about people like him) or is he actually going to stop blaming others and do something constructive for once in his life?

Dennis Johnson
Woodland
Editor’s Note: To read a special response from columnist Katy Grimes addressing this matter, visit www.SacUnion.com.
 
And of course, here is my repsponse:

Last week a reader responded to my column “From The Entitlement Generation to the Look At Me Generation,” with a letter to the Editor. His response was very personal; he obviously did not care for my message.

 

Identifying sociological generational characteristics obviously involves generalizations, but this is nothing new; all groups of individuals get generalized. For example, I’ve been called a “dumb blonde,” as well as a “conservative b***h.” 

 

Every generation is stereotyped. That is why I cited research. The young man who took the time to write the letter complaining about my generalizations of Baby Boomers, Gen X and the new “Look at me generation,” did not appreciate being called a slacker or my telling him to get a haircut. Being defensive usually means identifying with the accusation – even mildly.

 

But then he threw out the Iraq card. Yes, thousands of young men and women signed up for military service after 9/11, which is truly commendable. The writer should take notice that I did not write a word about Gen X military personnel. In fact, I’ve been vociferous in my support of America’s military. My own son is one of those young military men, who has chosen a career in the Navy during wartime.

 

The study of Sociology is a scientific and systematic study of society, patterns of social relationships, social interaction, and culture. Do I like being called a spoiled, self-centered Baby Boomer? No, but I am not spoiled nor self-centered. If I struck a nerve, think about why.

 

Katy Grimes

 

 What is that fabulous expression..."Buck up or shut up." Why doesn't anyone tell these whiners to "shut up?"

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Midshipman Arrives Home

I arrived at my office yesterday morning at the usual time. I hadn't even gotten coffee when I heard heavy clomping coming up the stairs, and not the usual footfalls of hurried sales reps. Walking straight for my office was my son, with his seabag over his shoulder, just off his submarine cruise. He wanted to surprise me.

That's my kind of a surprise. 

He had only arrived into port in Bremerton, WA hours earlier, been dropped off the sub and caught an early flight home. His submarine cruise was the culmination of his first year at the USNA. He is officially off until August 13th. 

The sub was a 600 foot nuclear submarine, of which there are no pictures becasue all cameras and cell phones were confiscated. Duh. Sending pictures home to mom from the Navy's Nuclear vessels is frowned upon. He did describe the ship - magnificent sounding. There were 150 men on it. 

This mom is happy to have her handsome son home for a little while. As I write this, his stuff is everywhere (already) - seabag on the floor full of dirty clothes, uniform waiting to be laundered, his cover (hat) on the kitchen counter looking very official, and he sleeps upstairs as if he never left.

Life is good. Politics can wait until tomorrow.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive