About Me

Name: Katy Grimes
Email: fetchingjen@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

More Democrats Get Countrywide Deals

Well, what do you know - more Democrats got special mortgage deals from Countrywide.
 
I am just spreading the love. From Conde Nast Portfolio:
 

Countrywide's Many 'Friends'

Senators Dodd and Conrad are among the government officials who scored V.I.P. loans from C.E.O. Angelo Mozilo. An exclusive Portfolio investigation.
Two U.S. senators, two former Cabinet members, and a former ambassador to the United Nations received loans from Countrywide Financial through a little-known program that waived points, lender fees, and company borrowing rules for prominent people.

Senators Christopher Dodd, Democrat from Connecticut and chairman of the Banking Committee, and Kent Conrad, Democrat from North Dakota, chairman of the Budget Committee and a member of the Finance Committee, refinanced properties through Countrywide’s “V.I.P.” program in 2003 and 2004, according to company documents and emails and a former employee familiar with the loans.

Other participants in the V.I.P. program included former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson, former Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala, and former U.N. ambassador and assistant Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke. Jackson was deputy H.U.D. secretary in the Bush administration when he received the loans in 2003. Shalala, who received two loans in 2002, had by then left the Clinton administration for her current position as president of the University of Miami. She is scheduled to receive a Presidential Medal of Freedom on June 19.

Holbrooke, whose stint as U.N. ambassador ended in 2001, was also working in the private sector when he and his family received V.I.P. loans. He was an adviser to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

James Johnson, who had been advising presidential candidate Barack Obama on the selection of a running mate, resigned from the Obama campaign Wednesday after the Wall Street Journal reported that he received Countrywide loans at below-market rates.

Most of the officials belonged to a group of V.I.P. loan recipients known in company documents and emails as “F.O.A.'s”—Friends of Angelo, a reference to Countrywide chief executive Angelo Mozilo. While the V.I.P. program also serviced friends and contacts of other Countrywide executives, the F.O.A.’s made up the biggest subset.

According to company documents and emails, the V.I.P.'s received better deals than those available to ordinary borrowers. Home-loan customers can reduce their interest rates by paying “points”—one point equals 1 percent of the loan’s value. For V.I.P.'s, Countrywide often waived at least half a point and eliminated fees amounting to hundreds of dollars for underwriting, processing and document preparation. If interest rates fell while a V.I.P. loan was pending, Countrywide provided a free “float-down” to the lower rate, eschewing its usual charge of half a point. Some V.I.P.'s who bought or refinanced investment properties were often given the lower interest rate associated with primary residences.

Unless they asked, V.I.P. borrowers weren’t told exactly how many points were waived on their loans, the former employee says. However, they were typically assured that they were receiving the “Friends of Angelo” discount, and that Mozilo had personally priced their loans.

The V.I.P. loans to public officials in a position to advance Countrywide’s interests raise legal and ethical questions. Countrywide’s ethics code bars directors, officers and employees from “improperly influencing the decisions of government employees or contractors by offering or promising to give money, gifts, loans, rewards, favors, or anything else of value.” Federal employees are prohibited from receiving gifts offered because of their official position, including loans on terms not generally available to the public. Senate rules prohibit members from knowingly receiving gifts worth $100 or more in a calendar year from private entities that, like Countrywide, employ a registered lobbyist.
Read the rest  here: I am going to vomit.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Are The Company You Keep

As I sit at my desk munching on carrot sticks during another lunch hour (because I've eaten too much beef this week), I am struck by the attempts of the Obama people (the mass media) to disassociate him from the weirdos and extremists he has surrounded himself with for his adulthood. Even Obama keeps throwing his own friends under the bus as they become liabilities to his reputation. But it's HIS reputation that's the stain.
 
As a child my parents taught me, "You are the company you keep." It's as plain and simple as that - if you run with bums, creeps, weirdos and freaks, you are also one.
 
How is it that the Messiah Obama's followers can't accept that he's just as much of an extremist as the freaks he associates with.
 
Naiveté' is not bliss. All these 16 years later with Bill Clinton's antics, and finally, the liberal left admits that he's a sexual freak. Will it take that long with the Obama flock? 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Liberal Agenda On Display

While the Senate lost just this morning  (51-43) on their attempt to tax "windfall oil profits," Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters already threatened to "socialize" the oil industry (I think she meant to say "nationalized). Watch the Fox news clip of Waters actually threatening to take over oil companies (sounds like hugo Chavez) here.

Then there is Dick Durbin demonizing profits: “The oil companies need to know that there is a limit on how much profit they can take in this economy,” said Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois, the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat, warning that if energy prices are not reined in “we’re going to find ourselves in a deep recession.”

Thank God they lost this vote. What industry will be their target next? Farming is already heavily subsidized, but not yet nationalized. Look out Apple and Microsoft: your "obsene profits" are a big target.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal Bunny Killers

The New York Times published a story yesterday titled, "Peter Rabbit Must Die." It seems that liberal organic gardeners are so fed up with critters eating their gardens that they are now killing the varments by bludgeoning them to death... and enjoying it.

THE homeowner, a city-boy artist and illustrator who had moved to rural Pennsylvania, never wanted to kill the woodchucks. Sure, they were ruining the garden and digging up the foundations of outbuildings, but it was a moral issue: the artist, who is still so uncomfortable about what transpired — and so concerned about how his New York clients would feel about it that he is not willing to be identified — did not want to take a life.

But he did it anyway.

I said: ‘I intend to kill you. You have 24 hours to get out,’ ” he recalls. “I wanted to give them fair warning. I said, ‘If I were you, I would find another place to live.’ I also promised them I would not take a shot unless I knew it would be fatal.”

He is making this into a funny story, he says, but when he killed his first woodchuck he “literally felt sick.”

“I went outside and knelt down to it and said a little prayer to whatever the powers that be that when my turn comes, I will do it as gracefully and uncomplainingly.”

Eventually, though, he embraced his mission, and grew so obsessed with it that an aunt began to call him Woodchuck Johnny. How many did he kill that summer?

“I stopped at 19,” he says.
 
Fuzzy bunny killer.
 
Another gardener, Susanne Williamns reported, on a pesky porcupine in her year: “He was after my carrot crop,” she explains. “I said, I just cannot handle this anymore. He sees me and tries to wander off, but they can’t run very fast. I got him with the sledgehammer. He tried to dodge me, but I got him on the head.”
And no, she hasn’t lost any sleep over it.
 
Ouch. Geez. Most of us have cats and dogs to chase away pests. Liberals claim to be so sensitive and caring - until it hits them in the pocketbook. Making an investment in gardening is costly. But most people realize that just as in Peter Rabbit, gardeners will lose some of their bounty to the critters. They don't bludgeon them to death.
 
There are a multitude of humane ways to take care of pests: Live traps and dogs and cats are probably the most effective. There is netting, fencing and specials cloth available to protect gardens.
 
Another woman and her husband trap and drown squirrels. These people are sick and need help.
 
Few who have made the leap from pacifism to search-and-destroy missions are this open on the subject. Who, after all, wants to risk being labeled a hardened animal killer? There are, however, those willing to take the heat. Boldest are those who admit to killing garden pests simply because they are annoying.
 
With books available on living with wildlife, and many creative ideas for dealing with furry pests, one can only conclude that these people see nothing wrong with their behavior. And this proves once again that conservatives are true conservationists; we don't randomly kill creatures who may be inconveniencing us.
 
There is also the approach offered by Catherine Wachs, a gardener who runs the Right Brain Design advertising company and lives in Larchmont, N.Y.: “I do what the Bible says: Leave the corners of your field unharvested for the poor and strangers among you.”
 
This behavior is however, what we have come to expect from liberals. They are all about peace and love - for everyone else. 
Hunting and fishing is acceptible and necessary; trapping and moving animals as well. City dwellers masquerading as landed gentry smashing woodchucks with sledgehammers or drowning squirrels, is deranged anyway you look at it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pastor Wright's Memos

Hugh Hewitt has placed on his blog, three pages of Pastor's memos to the Trinity United Church of Christ congregation at Obama's church. The significance of these dates is that Obama already knew he was running for President, but he did not distance himself from the race-baiting, tate filled, Black Liberation Pastor of Trinity United.
 
Obama's recent attempt to distance himself from Pastor Wright is a weak attempt to appease; it shows how much comtempt he has for Americans, and just how stupid he thinks we are. 
 
Take a look at these letters; the language is appalling and nothing like any church memo I've ever seen.
 
 
 
 
While Jeremiah Wright critizes anyone else for getting rich, own Bently's and fly around in Learjets, it's is okay for him to revel in his own wealth.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dems Go CHEAP on Convention

Big Deal. What else is new. Everyone already knows that the Democrats are cheap and don't pay their campaign bills anyway.
 
From The Denver Post: After months of planning for two dozen parties to fete the 56 delegations to the Democratic National Convention — and facing financial difficulties — the city's host committee is scrapping those parties and holding one big bash.
 
One big bash. One big bash of pure chaos. That sounds like fun. They'll probably serve pretzels and punch to keep costs down. Delegates will have to resort to bringing their own Cliff Bars and Vitamin Water in an environmentally friendly thermos.
The party for the 6,000 delegates and their guests on Aug. 24 will honor Friends of New Orleans, a charity formed to help that city recover from the devastation of Hurricane Katrina.The host committee originally said in a news release that Friends of New Orleans would be hosting the party. That is incorrect, according to the group, which raises funds for non-profit groups in Louisiana. The host committee is paying for the party. After the party, Friends of New Orleans is planning a gathering of its own at Fillmore Auditorium to raise awareness of the rebuilding efforts. The group plans a similar event at the Republican National Convention in Minnesota.
 
Now isn't that interesting... a charity originally formed to help Hurrican Katrina victims will be funding the Dems big bash.
 
These are the same people who have driven our economy in to the toilet, caused the increase of gas prices, the increasing unemployment rate, and they want total control of America? They can't even budget correctly for a convention.
 
The Democrats are famous for blowing into town, having fundraising events and then stiffing caterers, printers, bands and other vendors. COD: Democrats are well known for being required to pay cash upfront to vendors - because it's the only payment small vendors may see. 
 
Living the high life is more important than doing the right thing. The Clinton campaign was famous this past year for luxury travel, 5-star food, lavish fundraisers, and hundreds of small vendors left holding unpaid bills.
 
The Democratic Convention is too large and public an event for unpaid bills. But watch: They will suceed in stiffing local Denver companies one way or another.
 
Life is too short to be cheap and not pay your bills. But that's how they run the country: It's always "me first," with Democrats.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

REZKORAMABAMA

For excellent coverage of and all of the much-ignored details of the Tony Rezko/Obama connection, Rezko trial and conviction, visit the Rezkorama blog. Great posts such as Obama: No pardon for Rezko and People who might complicate Obama's campaign, and don't leave out Tony Rezko: Money troubles don't end or Rezko verdict hits close to governor.
Now we need a Michelle Obama "Whitey" blog, with audio of her famous rants. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shameful Low Voter Turnout

I stayed up late enough to watch the local news and results of the election. The coverage was embarrassingly "local." When the tree branch fell on the patio at the Heather Fargo party, the drama was unsurpassed. And embarrassing. A tree branch fell. No fireworks went off as was originally claimed by the news guy.
 
By 10:35 pm, I went to bed disgusted. Sam Shane on Channel 13 should not be allowed to speak without a cue card. The nonsensical and irrelevant comments he makes should be played back at him endlessly until he bags for more education.
 
This morning, I read that only 50,000 people in the City of Sacramento voted. We are a city of 475,000 residents.
 
Why don't people vote? I asked several people leading up to the election. The two standard answers were: "I am too busy," and "I am only one vote, and one vote doesn't count."
 
Only 10 days ago, I received a phone call from my son who was preparing to fill out his absentee voter ballot. He resides across the country at the Naval Academy in Annapolis, MD.  We walked through the issues, he voted and mailed his ballot. this morning I received a phone call from him inquiring about the election results. He is a 19-year old who voted absentee and called mom to find out the results from 3,000 miles away. So how is it that locals can't get themselves to the polling place or sign up for an absentee ballot?
 
People have become complacent and lazy in their prosperity. They also are not learning or caring about history and why every vote matters. Voting is a privilege, and honor. And unless we vote in every election, we don't deserve to whine about the way things are. And that is why Sacramento was stuck with heather Fargo for so many years, and why she nearly became Mayor for a third inadequate, term.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barrack Obama's Biggest Problem? Michelle Obama

with this explanation:
The Michelle Obama Rant Tape was filmed between June 26th - July 1st 2004 in Chicago, IL at the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition Conference at Trinity United Church: specifically the Women's Event.

 

Michelle Obama appeared as a panelist alongside Mrs. Khadijah Farrakhan and Mrs. James Meeks.

Bill Clinton spoke during the Conference, as did Bill Cosby and other speakers, but not at the panel Michelle attended.

Michelle Obama spoke at the Women's Event, but referenced Bill Clinton in her rant --- his presence at the conference was the impetus for her raving, it seems.

For about 30 minutes, Michelle Obama launched into a rant about the evils of America, and how America is to blame for the problems of Africa. Michelle personally blamed President Clinton for the deaths of millions of Africans and said America is responsible for the genocide of the Tutsis and other ethnic groups. She then launched into an attack on "whitey", and talked about solutions to black on black crime in the realm of diverting those actions onto white America. Her rant was fueled by the crowd: they reacted strongly to what she said, so she got more passionate and enraged, and that's when she completely loses it and says things that have made the mouths drop of everyone who's seen this.

The "tape" is a DVD that Trinity United sold on its website, and possibly offered free for download up until March 2008 when Trinity's site was scrubbed and the DVDs were no longer offered for sale.

This outburst happened just one month before the 2004 Democratic Convention, when Barack Obama delivered the keynote address.
Original Post:
The buzz about a tape surfacing of Michelle Obama ranting about "Whitey" together with Louis Farrakhan and the Reverend Jeremiah Wright is interesting, if not a deal breaker. When it comes out, Barack will be permanently branded with the Nation of Islam - not a good tag when running for President of the United States.
 
There is no coincidence that Barrack Obama "quit" his controversial church yesterday, just as news of this tape hit.
 
But his ties with the Nation of Islam do not get cut just because he "quits" the church. "Barack hired two members of the Nation of Islam to work on his staff—Jennifer Mason and Cynthia K. Miller. If Jeremiah Wright and Michael Pfleger (now placed on leave by the Cardinal of New York for his recent rant) had kept their yaps buttoned none of this would mean much. But the fact that both men have been—until scrubbed from the website in recent weeks—listed as spiritual advisors to Barack Obama and also are very close to Louis Farrakhan, forces the question about Barack’s faith and beliefs." (hat tip NoQuarter)
 
The word is that one of the Republican candidates no longer in the race (Rudy) acquired the tape. Republicans will most likely hold the tape until the fall. Because if Hillary had it, she'd let it out now to get rid of Obama.
 
Things will only get more interesting. Either way, Michelle Obama has using her own mouth, put her husband's foot in it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (16) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

USS Reagan and USS Clinton

USS Reagan and USS Clinton



There are two new Navy ships.

USS REAGAN and the USS Clinton

Seeing the USS Reagan next to the Arizona Memorial really puts its size into perspective... ENORMOUS!BEAUTIFUL!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What If? President Bush Speaks

If President Bush resigned today, this is what his speech would be....

 
Normally, I start these things out by saying 'My Fellow Americans.'   Not doing it this time.  If the polls are any indication, I don't know who more than half of you are anymore.  I do know something terrible has happened, and that you're really not fellow Americans any longer.

 
I'll cut right to the chase here: I quit. 

Now before anyone gets all in a lather about me quitting to avoid impeachment, or to avoid prosecution or something, let me assure you: There's been no breaking of laws or impeachable offenses in this office.

 


The reason I'm quitting is simple.  I'm fed up with you people. I'm fed up because you have no understanding of what's really going on in the world.  Or of what's going on in this once-great nation of ours.  And the majority of you are too damned lazy to do your homework and figure it out.


 
Let's start local. You've been sold a bill of goods by politicians and the news media.  Polls show that the majority of you think the economy is in the tank. And that's despite record numbers of homeowners, including record numbers of MINORITY homeowners. 

And while we're mentioning minorities, I'll point out that minority business ownership is at an all-time high.  Our unemployment rate is as low as it ever was during the Clinton administration.

I've mentioned all those things before, but it doesn't seem to have sunk in.

 


Despite the shock to our economy of 9/11, the stock market has rebounded to record levels and more Americans than ever are participating in these markets.  Meanwhile, all you can do is whine about gas prices, and most of you are too damn stupid to realize that gas prices are high because there's increased demand in other parts of the world, and because a small handful of noisy idiots are more worried about polar bears and beachfront property than your economic security.

 
We face real threats in the world.  Don't give me this 'blood for oil' thing. If I were trading blood for oil I would've already seized Iraq's oil fields and let the rest of the country go to hell. 

And don't give me this 'Bush Lied; People Died' crap either.  If I were the liar you morons take me for, I could've easily had chemical weapons planted in Iraq so they could be 'discovered.'  Instead, I owned up to the fact that the intelligence was faulty. 

 


Let me remind you that the rest of the world thought Saddam had the goods, same as me.  Let me also remind you that regime change in Iraq was official US policy before I came into office.  Some guy named 'Clinton' established that policy.  Bet you didn't know that, did you?

You idiots need to understand that we face a unique enemy. Back during the cold war, there were two major competing political and economic models squaring off.  We won that war, but we did so because fundamentally, the Communists wanted to survive, just as we do.  We were simply able to out spend and out-tech them.


 


That's not the case this time.  The soldiers of our new enemy don't care if they survive.  In fact, they want to die.

That'd be fine, as long as they weren't also committed to taking as many of you with them as they can.  But they are.  They want to kill you, and the bastards are all over the globe.

 
You should be grateful that they haven't gotten any more of us here in the United States since September 11.  But you're not.  That's because you've got no idea how hard a small number of intelligence, military, law enforcement, and homeland security people have worked to make sure of that. 

When this whole mess started, I warned you that this would be a long and difficult fight.  I'm disappointed how many of you people think a long and difficult fight amounts to a single season of 'Survivor.'

 


Instead, you've grown impatient.  You're incapable of seeing things through the long lens of history, the way our enemies do.  You think that wars should last a few months, a few years, tops.


 
Making matters worse, you actively support those who help the enemy.  Every time you buy the New York Times, every time you send a donation to a cut-and-run Democrat's political campaign, well, dang it, you might just as well FedEx a grenade launcher to a Jihadist.  It amounts to the same thing.

 


In this day and age, it's easy enough to find the truth. It's all over the Internet.  It just isn't on the pages of the New York Times or on NBC News.  But even if it were, I doubt you'd be any smarter. Most of you would rather watch American Idol.

 
I could say more about your expectations that the government will always be there to bail you out, even if you're too stupid to leave a city that's below sea level and has a hurricane approaching.

 



 
I could say more about your insane belief that government, not your own wallet, is where the money comes from.  But I've come to the conclusion that were I to do so, it would sail right over your heads.

 
So I quit.  I'm going back to Crawford.  I've got an energy-efficient house down there (Al Gore could only dream) and the capability to be fully self-sufficient. 

No one ever heard of Crawford before I got elected, and as soon as I'm done here pretty much no one will ever hear of it again.  Maybe I'll be lucky enough to die of old age before the last pillars of America fall.

 


Oh, and by the way, Cheney's quitting too. 

That means Pelosi is your new President.  You asked for it.  Watch what she does carefully, because I still have a glimmer of hope that there are just enough of you remaining who are smart enough to turn this thing around in 2008.


So that's it.  God bless what's left of America.  Some of you know what I mean.  The rest of you, kiss my Texas born and bred butt.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CA Assembly Passes Paid Sick Leave

How would you like 9 paid sick days each year, 1 to 2 weeks of vacation, and 9 paid holidays?
The California state Assembly just approved the bill that would to require employers to provide 9 paid days of sick leave for every worker.
 
As an employer of more than 50 employees, we already offer paid vacations, 3 "floating days," 9 paid holidays and subsidized health insurance. Forcing us to add more paid sick days is nothing more than giving every employee a raise.
 
Which means that there will probably be no raises this next year as we are already operating without a profit.
 
From The Sacramento Bee: Assemblywoman Fiona Ma, D-San Francisco, said her Assembly Bill 2716 would protect more than 5 million Californians – about a third of the work force – who are forced to choose between working while sick or losing pay.
"(It's) a win-win for workers and employers alike and is an important part of maintaining a healthy economy here in California," Ma said.
When employers offer paid sick days, employee morale is better, turnover is less, and health care costs decrease, Ma said.
Really? Does Fiona Ma employee workers? Does she know this first hand? No. Ms. Ma has only worked in politics - first for the esteemed John Burton, then as a San Francisco Supervisor, and now an Assembly woman, annointed by Fabian Nunez as Assembly Majority Whip.
 
She's been embroiled in scandals: Norman Hsu helped finance her assembly race, and has been embroiled in scandal with known Triad bad-guy Raymond Kwok Chow.
 
Bottom line: Fiona Ma is a San Francisco socialist who will continue to force employers, who she obviously sees as expendable, to pay out more and more to employees, for not showing up. California already has paid sick leave, funded through the EDD.
 
Employees are being gifted ridiculous time off days. Employers, especially small private sector employers, cannot operate with employees gone. We do not have layers of people all doing the same job the way the State does. When one of our employees is gone, the work does not get done, or other employees have to cover, sacrificing much of their own work.
 
As long as the California legislature continues to sell votes to the masses, we will move closer and closer to socialism. And slip firther and further away from individuality and personal responsibility, while penalizing the very employers who go out on a limb, take all of the risks of owning a business and who hire the employees.  Any profit that most small businesses once realized, are gone in the way of taxes, regulations, fees, workers health and comp insurance and absurd lawsuits.
 
Employers will be shutting doors rather than continue to pay out more than 65% of all sales to the government in one form or another.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Great Quotes from Snobama and Wife

I cannot take credit for this compilation of stupendous quotes.
 
John Hawkins at Right Wing News has put together a list of more than 50 quotes from Barack Obama, his wife, and Jeremiah Wright among others. You can read it here:
Some of those quotes include:
"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK. That's not leadership. That's not going to happen." -- Barack Obama
 
"...White folks' greed runs a world in need..." -- Jeremiah Wright
 
"(Obama) really has no experience or knowledge or judgment about the issue of Iraq and he has wanted to surrender for a long time." -- John McCain
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Manipulating An Election

Last evening Mayoral Candidate Kevin Johnson trounced Sacramento Mayor Heather Fargo in the only debate in this election cycle. He was on fire, lucid, prepared, had his facts straight and made her look like the "neighborhood activist" she is.
 
Today in the Sacramento Bee, the editorial board chose to ignore the debate win and instead published above the fold: Fargo leads Johnson in mayor poll; 29% undecided. The story is a fabrication - or perhaps a poll of the Sacramento Bee Editorial board. The debate coverage instead was a blow by blow of he said, she said. The writer's bias came through loud and clear.
 
It's despicable how the editors at The Bee don't believe in democracy or the voice of the people. They think they know what's best for Sacramento residents regardless of the fact that we will overwhelmingly and symbolically toss Heather Fargo out of office and elect a new Mayor.
 
I have interviewed Kevin Johnson twice for The Sacramento Union. Last night's debate showed the candidate I have come to know: confident, knowledgeable, passionate about our city, sincere and energetic. (read my interviews here: The Man Who Wants To Be Mayor; Kevin Johnson Talks with The Union)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Legislating Approval

The decision last week by the California Supreme Court  to uphold same-sex marriages will do very little in the way of gaining the approval that homosexuals are so desperate to receive. It will instead, produce in pro-marriage groups more determination to fight the idiotic pro-gay rights that have infiltrated so much of sane society. We must ask ourselves, why gays are so desperate for this "approval?"
 
Our state constitution already defined marriage as "a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between and man and a woman, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary." Citizens already know that civil unions do not have the same respect and equality as marriage. So gays worked to steal the word "marriage" for their own relationship description, hoping it would lend more credibility to their union. But almost more importantly, gays cannot produce children, meaning that they cannot continue creating and furthering society the way man/woman marriages can.
 
In a man/woman marriage, sexual relations also produce children. In gay marriage it's nothing more than sex for gratification. Man/woman relationships produce children and society continues. What gays do sexually is for pleasure only, and does not produce the "results" of a hetero sexual relationship. Homosexuality cheapens sex in that by claiming that what they do sexually is "okay," then any and all sex is okay. That's not a healthy message to send kids. For a society that has been trying to stop teenage promiscuity, STD's, illegitimate children and abortions, telling high school kids that it's okay to be gay (and having gay sex) is a conflicting message. 
 
No amount of legislation or judicial activism will produce the approval homosexual couples are seeking for the gay lifestyle. Marriage cannot be and will not be legislated. Marriage is more than the legal description, and that's why gays are fighting for this same societal approval. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive