About Me

Name: Katy Grimes
Email: fetchingjen@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

What Happened To FLAG Day?

June 14th - every year - is Flag Day. But this year I heard nothing about it.
During the recent Memorial Day weekend, in Sacramento, CA our City Council allowed war protestors to line Capitol Mall with tiny red and white flags, signifying Iraqi deaths (implying "thanks to our military"). The one man who tried to add 200 of his own tiny American Flags was met with resistance - physical, he was yelled at and threatened, as well as city police telling him that he had to remove them at the end of the day. Thank you Mayor Fargo and Councilman Ray Trethaway. I plan on making sure the Sacramento residents don't forget who made this possible.
 
Over this past weekend, I heard nothing, and read nothing about Flag Day in Sacramento. It just passed without anyone acknowledging the special day.
 
Bernard J. Cigrand, a grade school teacher in Waubeka, Wisc., is credited with creating Flag Day in 1885. President Woodrow Wilson made the first official Flag Day proclamation in 1916. In 1949, President Harry Truman signed a bill into law designating June 14 of each year as National Flag Day.

 

In his Flag Day proclamation, President Bush wrote, "On Flag Day, we remember those in uniform whose courage and sacrifice inspire us here at home. We also remember the rich history of one of our oldest national symbols and reflect on our duty to carry our heritage of freedom into the future."
 
There were Flag Day observances planned for several cities in Southern California. But I heard nothing from our city.
 
Anaheim's Flag Day celebration, included free flags, cake and ice cream, music and entertainment. Sounded like fun.
 
In my city (run by self-absorbed, anti-American, anti-war liberals), there was no parade, no ice cream and no flags.
 
Flag Day was first observed in 1877 on the 100th anniversary of the Continental Congress' adoption of the Stars and Stripes as the official flag of the United States. In that year, Congress asked that all public buildings fly the flag on June 14. The idea quickly caught on and many people wanted to participate in waving the flag. One early supporter was B. J. Cigrand, a Wisconsin schoolteacher who wanted June 14 to be known as "Flag Birthday."

In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson proclaimed Flag Day as a national celebration. However, the holiday was not officially recognized until 1949 when President Harry Truman signed the National Flag Day Bill. In 1996, President Bill Clinton issued the following proclamation:

By The President
Of The
United States Of America

A Proclamation

There is no better symbol of our country's values and traditions than the Flag of the United States of America. Chosen by the Continental Congress in 1777, it continues to exemplify the profound commitment to freedom, equality, and opportunity made by our founders more than two centuries ago. Our flag's proud stars and stripes have long inspired our people, and its beautiful red, white, and blue design is known around the world as a beacon of liberty and justice.
 
Today, America's Flag graces classrooms, statehouses, courtrooms, and churches, serving as a daily reminder of this Nation's past accomplishments and ongoing dedication to safeguarding individual rights. The brave members of our Armed Forces carry "Old Glory" with them as they fulfill their mission to defend the blessings of democracy and peace across the globe; our banner flies from public buildings as a sign of our national community; and its folds drape the tombs of our distinguished dead. The Flag is a badge of honor to all -- a sign of our citizens' common purpose.
 
...Another reason to get rid of the communists running our city.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Employer Conundrum

I received the following email from a Labor Lawyer today: 

I-9 auditor says, ‘Most companies fail this test’

Using a four-step test, attorney Jim Velasco audits companies’ I-9 procedures to make sure they comply with government standards. Most companies fail the test.

When Velasco walks into a company, he asks four major questions - pretty much the same ones a government inspector will ask when investigating an I-9 violation: 

1. Do you have policies and procedures for verifying an employee’s identity, and are they in writing? Has top management signed off on them? At a minimum, the policies should adhere to the requirements outlined in Form M-274 Employer Handbook from the U.S Citizen and Immigration Services. 

2. Do you conduct awareness training for staff who deal with I-9s? And is the training documented? 

3. Do you conduct sample audits of verification documents, including the I-9 forms and supporting documents? You can do the audit with in-house staff or hire an audit professional. 

4. If you find problems with a sample audit, do you conduct a wider audit to see if the problems are widespread? 

Velasco, writing in the summer issue of “Relationships” magazine, says that besides failing the four-part test, 30% to 50% of the companies have compliance problems just with the I-9s themselves. 

A big reason to take the four steps: Besides uncovering mistakes, the procedure amounts to an excellent “good faith” defense - that you’ve given it your best shot to comply - if government investigators do uncover a violation.

And I wrote back:
this is all good information but I want to know why we can't verify the validity of applicants' documents with the government?
 
I used to be able to log onto the employer page on Homeland Security's website, and verify the citizenship of an applicant. Then one day it just locked me out. I've since read that it's no longer available - no explanation, nothing for employers to help us comply.
 
So now, I have to be a document expert, and when I identify a questionable document, no one from the government assists me with how to handle the situation. I can't hire the employee, nor can I not hire them for fear of discrimination. I tell them to go to their nearest social security office, but no one from the INS, Homeland Security, Social Security will talk to me, much offer help.
 
Instead, we employers are threatened with the ramifications for the improper care and keeping of our filing systems. Our "validity" is questioned, our businesses threatened, instead of the illegal alien with the phony documents.
 
Go figure.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Al Gore Is A Moron

Al Gore is a moron, and so are his followers. Who on earth thinks that anything he has to say is worthy of listening? He's a bloated windbag, short on brains, long on idiotic rhetoric, who thinks he's a messiah.
 
Yesterday the breathless media talking heads were all atwitter over the big announcement: "Al Gore throws his weight behind Obama." Well, there certainly is a lot of weight to throw about. Does that mean we now have to listen to Reverend Al Gore preach to us until the November election?
 
For a chuckle, visit Al Gore's website: Al Gore.com  Read his message to his followers begging for more money, this time for the Obama campaign. He's still bitter and will get even with President Bush one way or another. So now, he's going to follow the candidate of hope and change (is that climate change?). He's nothing but a connection to the past - most of us were tired of him after the Clinton years. now he's really long-in-the-tooth and a bigger hack.
 
Gore's a fraud and not a very good one. How embarassing for those sheeple who claim to still follow the windbag, Reverend Gore. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Supreme Court Social Engineering

While hundreds of gay couples get married all over California today, the majority of California's population is shaking it's collective head. While five of the Supreme Court Justices ignored the will of the people and instead, thrust their activist views into the forefront, the other four justices included their criticism of their colleagues in the decision. They agree with us that Judicial activism has indeed occured, and don't like it one bit.
 
Watching the evening news programs last evening, each couple interviewed by news shows claimed that they just wanted to be treated as regular people. That's funny, no one I've talked to says anything otherwise. We just want marriage between a man and a woman to remain the precious and unique institution it is. And most people will tell you that laws, legislation or Supreme Court rulings will not provide the approval for gay couples. Less than 1% of the population  is gay - not the 10% lie that the media likes to perpetuate. Approval is what gays are seeking; they are already legally covered with formalized unions. 
 
These same media and news programs ignored the opinions of the four justices who decented from the decision, but you can read it for yourself: Opinion. Their brilliant legal analysis is spot on.
 
The social engineering taking place in this country is the same phenomenon that brought down the Roman Empire. It took them a few thousand years - we may accomplish this in a few hundred.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MSM Lies - For Ratings

As if the MSM lying for ratings is news, but in this instance, it is. The story now is less about whether or not Michelle Obama made her racial slur on tape, but about who and how it was leaked to the media.
 
Michelle Malkin has been working to dispell the Bob Beckel-created rumor about Michelle Obama's alleged rant where she used the word "Whitey:" here/
 
Meanwhile, Rush Limbaugh is irritated about being accused by the MSM for starting the rumor: Drive-Bys Cast Rush as Villain in Nonexistent Michelle Obama Tape
 
Bob Becktel is a bomb-throwing, self-aggrandizing, publicity hound. We'll have to stay tuned to see what shakes out of this. I still thin the story is about Michelle Obama.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Democrats Get Countrywide Deals

Well, what do you know - more Democrats got special mortgage deals from Countrywide.
 
I am just spreading the love. From Conde Nast Portfolio:
 

Countrywide's Many 'Friends'

Senators Dodd and Conrad are among the government officials who scored V.I.P. loans from C.E.O. Angelo Mozilo. An exclusive Portfolio investigation.
Two U.S. senators, two former Cabinet members, and a former ambassador to the United Nations received loans from Countrywide Financial through a little-known program that waived points, lender fees, and company borrowing rules for prominent people.

Senators Christopher Dodd, Democrat from Connecticut and chairman of the Banking Committee, and Kent Conrad, Democrat from North Dakota, chairman of the Budget Committee and a member of the Finance Committee, refinanced properties through Countrywide’s “V.I.P.” program in 2003 and 2004, according to company documents and emails and a former employee familiar with the loans.

Other participants in the V.I.P. program included former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson, former Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala, and former U.N. ambassador and assistant Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke. Jackson was deputy H.U.D. secretary in the Bush administration when he received the loans in 2003. Shalala, who received two loans in 2002, had by then left the Clinton administration for her current position as president of the University of Miami. She is scheduled to receive a Presidential Medal of Freedom on June 19.

Holbrooke, whose stint as U.N. ambassador ended in 2001, was also working in the private sector when he and his family received V.I.P. loans. He was an adviser to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

James Johnson, who had been advising presidential candidate Barack Obama on the selection of a running mate, resigned from the Obama campaign Wednesday after the Wall Street Journal reported that he received Countrywide loans at below-market rates.

Most of the officials belonged to a group of V.I.P. loan recipients known in company documents and emails as “F.O.A.'s”—Friends of Angelo, a reference to Countrywide chief executive Angelo Mozilo. While the V.I.P. program also serviced friends and contacts of other Countrywide executives, the F.O.A.’s made up the biggest subset.

According to company documents and emails, the V.I.P.'s received better deals than those available to ordinary borrowers. Home-loan customers can reduce their interest rates by paying “points”—one point equals 1 percent of the loan’s value. For V.I.P.'s, Countrywide often waived at least half a point and eliminated fees amounting to hundreds of dollars for underwriting, processing and document preparation. If interest rates fell while a V.I.P. loan was pending, Countrywide provided a free “float-down” to the lower rate, eschewing its usual charge of half a point. Some V.I.P.'s who bought or refinanced investment properties were often given the lower interest rate associated with primary residences.

Unless they asked, V.I.P. borrowers weren’t told exactly how many points were waived on their loans, the former employee says. However, they were typically assured that they were receiving the “Friends of Angelo” discount, and that Mozilo had personally priced their loans.

The V.I.P. loans to public officials in a position to advance Countrywide’s interests raise legal and ethical questions. Countrywide’s ethics code bars directors, officers and employees from “improperly influencing the decisions of government employees or contractors by offering or promising to give money, gifts, loans, rewards, favors, or anything else of value.” Federal employees are prohibited from receiving gifts offered because of their official position, including loans on terms not generally available to the public. Senate rules prohibit members from knowingly receiving gifts worth $100 or more in a calendar year from private entities that, like Countrywide, employ a registered lobbyist.
Read the rest  here: I am going to vomit.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Are The Company You Keep

As I sit at my desk munching on carrot sticks during another lunch hour (because I've eaten too much beef this week), I am struck by the attempts of the Obama people (the mass media) to disassociate him from the weirdos and extremists he has surrounded himself with for his adulthood. Even Obama keeps throwing his own friends under the bus as they become liabilities to his reputation. But it's HIS reputation that's the stain.
 
As a child my parents taught me, "You are the company you keep." It's as plain and simple as that - if you run with bums, creeps, weirdos and freaks, you are also one.
 
How is it that the Messiah Obama's followers can't accept that he's just as much of an extremist as the freaks he associates with.
 
Naiveté' is not bliss. All these 16 years later with Bill Clinton's antics, and finally, the liberal left admits that he's a sexual freak. Will it take that long with the Obama flock? 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Liberal Agenda On Display

While the Senate lost just this morning  (51-43) on their attempt to tax "windfall oil profits," Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters already threatened to "socialize" the oil industry (I think she meant to say "nationalized). Watch the Fox news clip of Waters actually threatening to take over oil companies (sounds like hugo Chavez) here.

Then there is Dick Durbin demonizing profits: “The oil companies need to know that there is a limit on how much profit they can take in this economy,” said Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois, the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat, warning that if energy prices are not reined in “we’re going to find ourselves in a deep recession.”

Thank God they lost this vote. What industry will be their target next? Farming is already heavily subsidized, but not yet nationalized. Look out Apple and Microsoft: your "obsene profits" are a big target.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal Bunny Killers

The New York Times published a story yesterday titled, "Peter Rabbit Must Die." It seems that liberal organic gardeners are so fed up with critters eating their gardens that they are now killing the varments by bludgeoning them to death... and enjoying it.

THE homeowner, a city-boy artist and illustrator who had moved to rural Pennsylvania, never wanted to kill the woodchucks. Sure, they were ruining the garden and digging up the foundations of outbuildings, but it was a moral issue: the artist, who is still so uncomfortable about what transpired — and so concerned about how his New York clients would feel about it that he is not willing to be identified — did not want to take a life.

But he did it anyway.

I said: ‘I intend to kill you. You have 24 hours to get out,’ ” he recalls. “I wanted to give them fair warning. I said, ‘If I were you, I would find another place to live.’ I also promised them I would not take a shot unless I knew it would be fatal.”

He is making this into a funny story, he says, but when he killed his first woodchuck he “literally felt sick.”

“I went outside and knelt down to it and said a little prayer to whatever the powers that be that when my turn comes, I will do it as gracefully and uncomplainingly.”

Eventually, though, he embraced his mission, and grew so obsessed with it that an aunt began to call him Woodchuck Johnny. How many did he kill that summer?

“I stopped at 19,” he says.
 
Fuzzy bunny killer.
 
Another gardener, Susanne Williamns reported, on a pesky porcupine in her year: “He was after my carrot crop,” she explains. “I said, I just cannot handle this anymore. He sees me and tries to wander off, but they can’t run very fast. I got him with the sledgehammer. He tried to dodge me, but I got him on the head.”
And no, she hasn’t lost any sleep over it.
 
Ouch. Geez. Most of us have cats and dogs to chase away pests. Liberals claim to be so sensitive and caring - until it hits them in the pocketbook. Making an investment in gardening is costly. But most people realize that just as in Peter Rabbit, gardeners will lose some of their bounty to the critters. They don't bludgeon them to death.
 
There are a multitude of humane ways to take care of pests: Live traps and dogs and cats are probably the most effective. There is netting, fencing and specials cloth available to protect gardens.
 
Another woman and her husband trap and drown squirrels. These people are sick and need help.
 
Few who have made the leap from pacifism to search-and-destroy missions are this open on the subject. Who, after all, wants to risk being labeled a hardened animal killer? There are, however, those willing to take the heat. Boldest are those who admit to killing garden pests simply because they are annoying.
 
With books available on living with wildlife, and many creative ideas for dealing with furry pests, one can only conclude that these people see nothing wrong with their behavior. And this proves once again that conservatives are true conservationists; we don't randomly kill creatures who may be inconveniencing us.
 
There is also the approach offered by Catherine Wachs, a gardener who runs the Right Brain Design advertising company and lives in Larchmont, N.Y.: “I do what the Bible says: Leave the corners of your field unharvested for the poor and strangers among you.”
 
This behavior is however, what we have come to expect from liberals. They are all about peace and love - for everyone else. 
Hunting and fishing is acceptible and necessary; trapping and moving animals as well. City dwellers masquerading as landed gentry smashing woodchucks with sledgehammers or drowning squirrels, is deranged anyway you look at it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pastor Wright's Memos

Hugh Hewitt has placed on his blog, three pages of Pastor's memos to the Trinity United Church of Christ congregation at Obama's church. The significance of these dates is that Obama already knew he was running for President, but he did not distance himself from the race-baiting, tate filled, Black Liberation Pastor of Trinity United.
 
Obama's recent attempt to distance himself from Pastor Wright is a weak attempt to appease; it shows how much comtempt he has for Americans, and just how stupid he thinks we are. 
 
Take a look at these letters; the language is appalling and nothing like any church memo I've ever seen.
 
 
 
 
While Jeremiah Wright critizes anyone else for getting rich, own Bently's and fly around in Learjets, it's is okay for him to revel in his own wealth.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dems Go CHEAP on Convention

Big Deal. What else is new. Everyone already knows that the Democrats are cheap and don't pay their campaign bills anyway.
 
From The Denver Post: After months of planning for two dozen parties to fete the 56 delegations to the Democratic National Convention — and facing financial difficulties — the city's host committee is scrapping those parties and holding one big bash.
 
One big bash. One big bash of pure chaos. That sounds like fun. They'll probably serve pretzels and punch to keep costs down. Delegates will have to resort to bringing their own Cliff Bars and Vitamin Water in an environmentally friendly thermos.
The party for the 6,000 delegates and their guests on Aug. 24 will honor Friends of New Orleans, a charity formed to help that city recover from the devastation of Hurricane Katrina.The host committee originally said in a news release that Friends of New Orleans would be hosting the party. That is incorrect, according to the group, which raises funds for non-profit groups in Louisiana. The host committee is paying for the party. After the party, Friends of New Orleans is planning a gathering of its own at Fillmore Auditorium to raise awareness of the rebuilding efforts. The group plans a similar event at the Republican National Convention in Minnesota.
 
Now isn't that interesting... a charity originally formed to help Hurrican Katrina victims will be funding the Dems big bash.
 
These are the same people who have driven our economy in to the toilet, caused the increase of gas prices, the increasing unemployment rate, and they want total control of America? They can't even budget correctly for a convention.
 
The Democrats are famous for blowing into town, having fundraising events and then stiffing caterers, printers, bands and other vendors. COD: Democrats are well known for being required to pay cash upfront to vendors - because it's the only payment small vendors may see. 
 
Living the high life is more important than doing the right thing. The Clinton campaign was famous this past year for luxury travel, 5-star food, lavish fundraisers, and hundreds of small vendors left holding unpaid bills.
 
The Democratic Convention is too large and public an event for unpaid bills. But watch: They will suceed in stiffing local Denver companies one way or another.
 
Life is too short to be cheap and not pay your bills. But that's how they run the country: It's always "me first," with Democrats.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

REZKORAMABAMA

For excellent coverage of and all of the much-ignored details of the Tony Rezko/Obama connection, Rezko trial and conviction, visit the Rezkorama blog. Great posts such as Obama: No pardon for Rezko and People who might complicate Obama's campaign, and don't leave out Tony Rezko: Money troubles don't end or Rezko verdict hits close to governor.
Now we need a Michelle Obama "Whitey" blog, with audio of her famous rants. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shameful Low Voter Turnout

I stayed up late enough to watch the local news and results of the election. The coverage was embarrassingly "local." When the tree branch fell on the patio at the Heather Fargo party, the drama was unsurpassed. And embarrassing. A tree branch fell. No fireworks went off as was originally claimed by the news guy.
 
By 10:35 pm, I went to bed disgusted. Sam Shane on Channel 13 should not be allowed to speak without a cue card. The nonsensical and irrelevant comments he makes should be played back at him endlessly until he bags for more education.
 
This morning, I read that only 50,000 people in the City of Sacramento voted. We are a city of 475,000 residents.
 
Why don't people vote? I asked several people leading up to the election. The two standard answers were: "I am too busy," and "I am only one vote, and one vote doesn't count."
 
Only 10 days ago, I received a phone call from my son who was preparing to fill out his absentee voter ballot. He resides across the country at the Naval Academy in Annapolis, MD.  We walked through the issues, he voted and mailed his ballot. this morning I received a phone call from him inquiring about the election results. He is a 19-year old who voted absentee and called mom to find out the results from 3,000 miles away. So how is it that locals can't get themselves to the polling place or sign up for an absentee ballot?
 
People have become complacent and lazy in their prosperity. They also are not learning or caring about history and why every vote matters. Voting is a privilege, and honor. And unless we vote in every election, we don't deserve to whine about the way things are. And that is why Sacramento was stuck with heather Fargo for so many years, and why she nearly became Mayor for a third inadequate, term.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barrack Obama's Biggest Problem? Michelle Obama

with this explanation:
The Michelle Obama Rant Tape was filmed between June 26th - July 1st 2004 in Chicago, IL at the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition Conference at Trinity United Church: specifically the Women's Event.

 

Michelle Obama appeared as a panelist alongside Mrs. Khadijah Farrakhan and Mrs. James Meeks.

Bill Clinton spoke during the Conference, as did Bill Cosby and other speakers, but not at the panel Michelle attended.

Michelle Obama spoke at the Women's Event, but referenced Bill Clinton in her rant --- his presence at the conference was the impetus for her raving, it seems.

For about 30 minutes, Michelle Obama launched into a rant about the evils of America, and how America is to blame for the problems of Africa. Michelle personally blamed President Clinton for the deaths of millions of Africans and said America is responsible for the genocide of the Tutsis and other ethnic groups. She then launched into an attack on "whitey", and talked about solutions to black on black crime in the realm of diverting those actions onto white America. Her rant was fueled by the crowd: they reacted strongly to what she said, so she got more passionate and enraged, and that's when she completely loses it and says things that have made the mouths drop of everyone who's seen this.

The "tape" is a DVD that Trinity United sold on its website, and possibly offered free for download up until March 2008 when Trinity's site was scrubbed and the DVDs were no longer offered for sale.

This outburst happened just one month before the 2004 Democratic Convention, when Barack Obama delivered the keynote address.
Original Post:
The buzz about a tape surfacing of Michelle Obama ranting about "Whitey" together with Louis Farrakhan and the Reverend Jeremiah Wright is interesting, if not a deal breaker. When it comes out, Barack will be permanently branded with the Nation of Islam - not a good tag when running for President of the United States.
 
There is no coincidence that Barrack Obama "quit" his controversial church yesterday, just as news of this tape hit.
 
But his ties with the Nation of Islam do not get cut just because he "quits" the church. "Barack hired two members of the Nation of Islam to work on his staff—Jennifer Mason and Cynthia K. Miller. If Jeremiah Wright and Michael Pfleger (now placed on leave by the Cardinal of New York for his recent rant) had kept their yaps buttoned none of this would mean much. But the fact that both men have been—until scrubbed from the website in recent weeks—listed as spiritual advisors to Barack Obama and also are very close to Louis Farrakhan, forces the question about Barack’s faith and beliefs." (hat tip NoQuarter)
 
The word is that one of the Republican candidates no longer in the race (Rudy) acquired the tape. Republicans will most likely hold the tape until the fall. Because if Hillary had it, she'd let it out now to get rid of Obama.
 
Things will only get more interesting. Either way, Michelle Obama has using her own mouth, put her husband's foot in it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (16) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

USS Reagan and USS Clinton

USS Reagan and USS Clinton



There are two new Navy ships.

USS REAGAN and the USS Clinton

Seeing the USS Reagan next to the Arizona Memorial really puts its size into perspective... ENORMOUS!BEAUTIFUL!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive