Posted by
Katy Grimes on Friday, August 29, 2008 1:21:26 PM
From my column in
thesacramentounion
The city of Sacramento recently announced the results of a police department racial profiling “study.” Yet, the results were already determined.
The Sacramento Community Racial Profiling Commission, at the behest of Sacramento Mayor Heather Fargo and the City Council, initiated a “comprehensive study” to analyze traffic stops made by Sacramento police. The “chosen” consultant, Lamberth Consulting, was hired by the city at a cost of $230,000 to do the “study” on Sacramento’s police department.
Unfortunately, the outcome was predictable.
According to the Web site of the Racial Profiling Commission, “following a renewed commitment to unbiased policing in March 2006, the commission members meticulously chose the Study Consultant, Dr. John Lamberth…” to conduct the study. However, so does every other city in America looking to politically label their police departments as racists.
The Man and the Method
Dr. John Lamberth of Lamberth Consulting, founded in year 2000, has a vested interest in almost always finding the police departments he is hired to “study” as racially biased. He is paid enormously for these specific “findings,” and works with groups such as the ACLU, the NAACP and Amnesty International.
Lamberth has found many cities that have police departments whose police officers stop drivers because of race, including his almost identical reports for the cities of San Antonio, Texas and Grand Rapids, Mich.
Since Sacramento police officers were found by Lamberth to racially profile when making traffic stops, guess who is providing racial sensitivity training to our police department? Lamberth Consulting. The city of Sacramento paid Lamberth $230,000 up front. And now we are paying them for the sensitivity training to fix the problem they found? Can you say conflict of interest? Lamberth Consulting is reminiscent of a Jesse Jackson-style racial shakedown.
Unfortunately, the inevitable fallout will be Sacramento police reducing the number of traffic stops made in largely minority neighborhoods, which would be hit hardest by police backing off traffic stops. It will be Oak Park, Meadowview and Del Paso Heights that suffer. And Dr. Lamberth already knows this. It’s happened before. It is called “depolicing.”
Another View
Dr. Heather MacDonald, a Manhattan Institute scholar and fellow who has studied the fallacy of racial profiling extensively, writes, “Cincinnati is a perfect example of the ‘depolicing’ effect. In 2001, a Cincinnati police officer fatally shot an unarmed teenager, triggering three days of vicious race riots and a tsunami of unjustified media and political charges of racism. In response, the Cincinnati police department pulled way back. Arrests dropped 50 percent in the first three months after the riots; traffic stops fell nearly 55 percent. In the summer of 2001, Cincinnati resembled the Wild West—the city had never seen such violent crime. Drug dealers operated with near impunity on the streets.”
Is this what Sacramento leaders are really looking for?
MacDonald is highly critical of Lamberth for good reason: Two studies, both by Temple University social psychologist John Lamberth, have attempted to create a “violator” benchmark, a “violator” being that individual whom initiated actions warranting police intervention. The ACLU used one study to sue the Maryland state police; a criminal defense attorney in New Jersey used the other study to free 17 accused black drug traffickers.
Lamberth alleged that blacks in Maryland and southern New Jersey were stopped at higher rates than their representation in the violator population would seemingly warrant. But he defined “violator” so broadly – in Maryland, traveling at least one mile over the speed limit, and in New Jersey, traveling at least six miles over the speed limit – that he included virtually the entire driving population.
Lamberth must not have spent much time talking to real cops, for his definition of violator ignores how police actually decide whom to stop. Someone gliding sedately at 56 mph in a 55 mph zone has a radically different chance of being pulled over than someone barreling along at 80 mph down the same street. An adequate benchmark must capture the kind of driving likely to draw police attention.
Lamberth is the latest fad as a racial profiling guru and the new go-to-guy for misguided cities looking to throw money away.