About Me

Name: Katy Grimes
Email: fetchingjen@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Sacramento Taxpayer Tea Party

Today's Tea Party in Sacramento was really something to behold. There were  thousands and thousands of orderly, polite, friendly, clean, hard-working taxpayers. 
 
My favorite sign of the day: "YOU LOST ME AT GEITHNER"

Standing in front of the Capitol, I witnessed Capitol staffers leaning out office windows to snap photos of the event. One legislator and staffer hung a banner from a balcony, which only elicited yells from a few in the crowd for them to come down and be with the voters. Instead they went back inside. The banner was difficult to read and had a number on it... it turns out that the banner claimed that the legislature claims to have saved us more than $26 million in budget cuts. Who do they think they are kidding? Not one state employee has been cut.

As I handed out flags, one man told me that he had been holding one just like it but was forced to give it up when he went inside the capitol. He said the police even forced him to put it on the ground. He asked why but no one would tell him. What's wrong with a state capitol that requires citizens to throw away their flags?

Eric Hogue (KTKZ 1380) broadcasted his show and fired up the thousands of patriots. Armstrong and Getty (KSTE 650) addressed the crown as did Mark Williams who also got the crowd excited. Tom McClintock spoke eloquently and firmly about excessive government spending. Michael Reagan was a speaker. Event organizer Mark Meckler was excellent as he explained the impetus for wanting to do the event and calling out Republican leadership.
 
The ever expanding Obama government was a theme amongst protest attendees as everyone in attendance at the Tax Day Tea Parties is a taxpayer, unlike most protestors. Obama's "95% of Americans will receive a tax cut" only means that more Americans will not be paying federal taxes anymore placing more of the burden on hard working middle America.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Staging Military Hugs

Right Wing news has the scoop on the military's reception of Obama in Iraq... all staged.
 
http://www.facebook.com/ext/share.php?sid=88238081411&h=_p39X&u=4Femn&ref=nf
 
Duh - it's just funny how long it took to prove it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oh, the Whiiinnning

Liberals are incessant whiners - we already know that. As children, they cry, whine, pout and throw tantrums - and that's just in middle school. By the time they reach college, the crying, whining, and tantrums manifest in liberal behavior - making excuses for why they can't perform or do something. 
As adults, the whining turns into more incideous behavior - underhanded lying, cheating to get their way, protesting when they disagree instead of verbally arguing, destroying property, passing judgment and misusing any power they have achieved - in a job, volunteer position, as parent volunteer leaders (scouts, sports, schools) and worst of all, in politics.
 
California politicians are a textbook example of this: Fabian Nunez, Diane Watson, Henry Waxman, Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Antonio Villarigiosa, Phil Angelides, Don Perata, and all of the union thugs who make up their political following.
 
President Obama and VP Joe Biden have coined a mantra whine: "The Bush Administration" is at fault - because they can't be wrong. When they won't or don't have an answer, they just scream, "President Bush!" Whenever Obama gets asked a question he doesn't like, he becomes indignant and accusatory, and the answer always turns to President Bush. Obama has no class.
 
In his column today, Byron York further explains: "For their part, Obama defenders say it’s the Bushies who are throwing stones. They point to an interview in which former Vice President Dick Cheney was asked whether Obama policies like closing Guantanamo and CIA detention facilities have "made Americans less safe." "I do," Cheney answered. "He is making some choices that, in my mind, will, in fact, raise the risk to the American people of another attack."
Cheney's words outraged Team Obama. But the Bush sources I spoke to not only supported Cheney but wondered what the fuss was about. Didn't Obama and other Democrats spend years accusing Bush, the sitting president, of making America less safe? (Indeed they did; you can look it up.)"
 
Diversion, deflection, distortion, replace the outright incessant whining, pouting, tantrums and crying. Both parties have their problem children, but the Democrats specialize in lies, cheating to win, and blaming everyone else when they fail.
 
Read Byron York's Wasington Times column: HERE
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Honk If You Are a Radicalized Rightwing Extremist!

I shouldn't wear my gold cross any more unless I am okay with being identified as a "Right Wing Extremist."
 
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) just let leak a sham report calling conservatives "Rightwing extremists," and to warn police that we are danerous. And no coincidence that the report was leaked out the day before the Tax Day Tea Parties all over the country. The last time I checked, the tea parties were non-parisan - don't Democrats pay taxes as well? Oops, my bad... no one in the Obama Cabinet pays taxes.
 
From the DHS report:
(U//FOUO) DHS/I&A will be working with its state and local partners over the next several months to ascertain with greater regional specificity the rise in rightwing extremist activity in the United States, with a particular emphasis on the political, economic, and social factors that drive rightwing extremist radicalization.
 
We'd better watch out tomorrow - our local police have apparently been ordered to round up the right wing extremists... but using the DHS definition, all of the police officers that I know and love are also right wing extremists.
 
Michelle Malkin suggsts making a few new signs for tomorrow:

Honk if you’re a radicalized rightwing extremist!

Guilty of rightwing extremist chatter

Anti-government, pro-freedom: Sue me
 
The report: (PDF file here) It's so bad that I thought it was a joke. If I end up in jail tomorrow, we'll know that Janet Napolitano and Obama are not kidding.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Silence The Day of Silence

With the Day of Silence coming up on april 17th, Sacramento high schools seem to celebrate the day, and force all students to participate.

Instead of keeping my son home every year while he was in high school, we fought it.

Here is a Sacramento Union column I wrote about my experiences with the liberals at his high school. And read the information and research done by The Capitol Resource Institute http://www.capitolresource.org

Why Is The Majority Silenced?

 

By Katy Grimes

 

Every April for the past few years I have written to the Principal at C.K. McClatchy High School where my son attends, and registered my complaint about the school allowing and encouraging teacher and student participation in the pro-homosexual Day Of Silence.

From the Day of Silence website:
The Day of Silence, a project of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) in collaboration with the United States Student Association (USSA), is a student-led day of action where those who support making anti-LGBT bias unacceptable in schools take a day-long vow of silence to recognize and protest the discrimination and harassment -- in effect, the silencing -- experienced by LGBT students and their allies.

”Outside of class time”, the students present the following message:
I am speaking the Truth to break the silence. Silence isn't freedom. It's a constraint. Truth tolerates open discussion, because the Truth emerges when healthy discourse is allowed. By proclaiming the Truth in love, hurts will be halted, hearts will be healed, and lives will be saved.
 
Students who do not participate in the Day Of Silence are routinely called Homophobes, for talking and participating as they normally would during a school day. When “straight” students speak out about their frustration and displeasure at the disruption in the classrooms, they are called everything from Fascists to homophobes, and of course, Christian right-wing freaks. For most kids, their primary objection to the homosexual and transgender agenda at school, is the very concept of homosexuality. They are “grossed out” at the public displays of homosexuals embracing and the idea of homosexual sex. It’s that basic.

In April 2006, the Sacramento City Unified School District Board of Directors voted to adopt a Resolution on the Day Of Silence.
The following is an inner-office memo from Arturo Flores, Susan Miller, Evan Lum and Joan Polster (Assistant Superintendents) to Sacramento City Unified School District Principals and school officials:
On April 2, 2006 the Board of Education is expected to approve a Resolution proclaiming Wednesday, April 26, 2006 as the Day of Silence, "to recognize the silencing of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning people due to discrimination everyday in our society."
In anticipation of the Day of Silence observance by students please notify staff of the anticipated support for Day of Silence and the need to develop lesson plans that will allow students observance.
Students who participate chose to be silent for an entire day to call attention to the event. They wear a rainbow ribbon on their shirts and carry a small paper that explains about the day to anyone who asks why they are not speaking.

What unspeakable nonsense (pun intended). These are educators?

 

The law already protects many groups of people from harassment, but it is only by dealing with individual cases and holding people accountable, that any form of harassment can actually be changed - one person at a time.

You cannot legislate ethics or morality or common sense or sensitivity. Forcing students to respect classmates is impractical and irrelevant. We send our students to school to become educated in academics (since parents are not educators), and for college preparedness. We also have a reasonable expectation that they will be exposed to career options, they will tempt fate, experience curiosity, feel out their intellectuality, learn about other people and the world around them, and learn about self-esteem and self-worth through earning it themselves. Legislating self-worth with a Board Resolution is naïve at best, but mostly impertinent, inappropriate and subversive.

Last April 2006, in addition to the SCUSD Board’s idiotic resolution, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 vote, decided schools can forbid students from wearing a shirt that demeans gay and lesbian students. The originating case was a Poway High School student in San Diego who wore a T-shirt to school calling homosexuality "shameful." The most recent example is the group of fifteen San Juan High School students suspended for wearing t-shirts that read: Sodomy is a sin.  They were suspended as reported by the director of high schools for the San Juan Unified School District for  “wearing shirts that are inappropriate for school because their message targets a group of students." Hmmm.

Gay and lesbian students "have the right to 'be secure and be let alone,'" wrote Judge Stephen Reinhardt, referencing a 1969 case, Tinker v. Des Moines. In that case, students in an Iowa school district were suspended after they wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War.

Vietnam War versus gay rights protests; I don’t see the connection. Nowhere in the Bill of Rights is there a guarantee of the “right to be secure” and “ be let alone” any more than the  “right to not be offended,” which seems to be so popular among do-gooders.

The Supreme Court however, ruled in favor of the students, stating that schools could restrict student expression only when it "materially disrupts classwork or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others."

However, Reinhardt wrote that the Poway High student's T-shirt "was injurious to gay and lesbian students and interfered with their right to learn." So much for the Supreme Court being the highest court in the land.

Tobias Barrington Wolff, a law professor at UC Davis, commented on Reinhardt’s ruling saying that the stipulation is “problematic.” "I'm troubled by the notion that a student could perhaps come into school wearing a T-shirt that says Christian fundamentalism is shameful, and that might be OK, whereas a student wearing a 'Homosexuality is shameful' shirt is subject to discipline or suspension," he said.

During the 2004 Presidential election, students at C.K. McClatchy High School who wore “BUCK FUSH” t-shirts were not sent home. That qualifies as offensive, and vulgar and according to the Supreme Court, “materially disrupts classwork or involves substantial disorder.”

The Left-leaning bumbles on the Sacramento City Unified School District Board approved the Resolution acknowledging the Day of Silence in spite of the more than 500 angry parents who attended the board meeting in protest in April 2006. The Board ignored the pleas of parents and students, and approved the resolution because they wanted to.

 

The Day of Silence Resolution instructs school districts to notify staff so they can support the Day of Silence and develop lesson plans that will allow students observance. In other words, teachers are required to set aside their regularly-scheduled lesson plans and permit an entire school day to be hijacked by political activists with a controversial agenda.

 

There is no justification for school districts to be forced to give up an entire school day to cater to extreme activists. Day of Silence undermines education and forces children to focus on doubtful assertions that a group of people have been denied First Amendment protections because of their controversial sexual lifestyle. What about the San Juan High  students and their First Amendment protections?

 

The GLSEN (Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network) website offers a research tool to find out if your campus is a GLSEN-friendly campus.

For pro-gay groups such as (PFLAG) Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays and GLSEN to claim they only promote acceptance of homosexuality, bisexuality and cross-dressing, is nonsense. Both of the PFLAG and GLSEN websites promote gay-teen books, have gay-teen and man-boy pamphlets available and GLSEN even has the books for sale on their website. View their webstites; you decide what their agenda is.

 

Why is the pro-gay agenda even allowed in schools? When high schools in the Sacramento City Unified School District have a 48% - 50% graduation rate, shouldn’t we expect the educators and administrators to focus more closely on academics and less on social agendas? 50% of the senior class at C.K. McClatchy could not pass the California High School Exit Exam.

 

How does a tiny minority of the population have such a stranglehold on something as important as academic education? And why do the school districts allow such inflamatory diversions in education? Look no further than the Board Members of the Sacramento City Unified School District and their wanton agendas… The Day of Silence Resolution, their Anti-War Resolution, neither of which has anything to do with education.

 

Is it any wonder parents choose Charter Schools and homeschool? My son is about to graduate high school; and while I am relieved that we are closing a chapter on this constant battle for respectability and commonm sense, I am compelled to continue the fight for the other common sense parents out there who just want their kids to learn math, science and reading. Most parents don’t want homosexuality discussed in the classroom, muchless an entire school day or a week of awareness devoted to silence honoring the homosexual lifestyle.

 

Reasearch your kids’ school; if it’s a high school, there will be a GLSEN club and plenty of teachers with “diversity training” from SEED (Seeking Educational Equity and Diversity)  Teachers are encouraged to use SEED-approved curriculum, material and media and to “make gays and lesbians visible at all grade levels and in all subject areas.” Elementary school and middle school teachers have the same “diversity training;” only this is not about ethnicity. It’s about an indecent, fractional minority dominating and holding hostage, the majority. The majority does not have to accept this. Now make your common sense known and heard.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No "Diversity" At Tea Parties

Geraldo Rivera is complaining loudly because he doesn't see any people of color" at the Tax Tea Party rallies. The "diversity" cry from the racist left is almost laughable.
 
There may in fact be no diversity at the Tax Day rallies - Why? Because we are all Americans who are fed up with outrageous spending and taxation. We who plan on attending don't care about our fellow Americans' ethnicity as long as they are American. Only the racist, elitist left is keeping track of color.
 
here is an interesting blog:  http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/04/tea-parties-are-sooo-scaaary.html that addresses the shreiking left
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Everyone Is a Winner

"GOOD JOB!" Everywhere I go today, I hear parents falsely praise their kids over the most mundane and expcted tasks and actions.
 
I have written extensively about the bogus self-esteem movement from the 1980's and what a load of garbage is is and was. The result of the false self-esteem is millions of kids who think that everything they do is spectacular. Everyone is a winner and deserves a blue ribbon and trophy - And only produced a generation of narcissistic, emotionally frail young adults. 
 
(The column as well as the blog post, received a great deal of commentary: Competitive Parenting 1-A:
HERE and
 
Competitive Parents all want their kids to be winners - all part of the Self Esteem movement. The "Me" Generation produces the most spoiled, self-centered kids who make lousy, whiny employees.
 
Today's young parents tell their children that everything they do is great. They "Good Job" them for everything - even the things that they tell the kids to do, or are expected. Washing hands before dinner, going to the bathroom, turning the television off, closing a door, getting in and out of the car... why do any of these deserve a "Good Job?"
 
The young children of these praising parents will throw tantrums if they don't get a "Good Job" for every little thing, that's why. The drama and bad behavior that is allowed today is deplorable. The parents should be embarrassed but instead think that everything their kids do is cute and deserving praise.
 
In The Minneapolis Star Tribune last week, a story addressed this very issue. "Are We Good-JOBing Our Kids To Pieces?" HERE One teacher correctly identifies this problem:
"I try to avoid complimenting them all the time," he said. "If they get strokes for everything, they expect it, they think everything they do is great -- and they don't want to push themselves. I think they need to develop self-drive and the need to perform for personal satisfaction, not recognition from others."
Touche`.
 
Dr. Ernie Swihart, an author and behavioral pediatrician at South Lake Pediatrics in Minnetonka, decried the self-esteem movement from its inception. Then, s now, he believed kids should be taught to be inwardly focused, self-sufficient creatures able to shift their own gears.
 
"Real self-esteem -- for all of us -- comes from overcoming an obstacle-laden challenge, he believes, with hard work. Lavishing praise, he contends, is counterproductive and, if anything, makes kids needy and voracious for that other self-esteem-movement buzzword: validation.

"It's had serious repercussions," Swihart said. "These young adults who were raised in the '80s, now in their 20s and in the workplace -- those who received praise, rewards and prizes for everything they did without working very hard -- often are very entitled and self-absorbed.

"And in this economy, baseless self-satisfaction and entitlement are dangerous. Those are the people who are first to be let go."
 
Dr. Swihart is correct - not only are the chronically self-absorbed the first to be let go, they are also the first to quit when they receive criticism for their work or performance.
 
Overpraising kids will undoubtedly lead them right into therapy down the road. Often described as almost a nervous verbal tic, listening to parents repeat over and over, "good job, good job" is about as annoying as the stupid and un-cute things kids are attempting to get the false praise. Tripping and falling and them getting back up is not cute and not worthy of a "good job." Shreiking to get attention and then getting a "good job" when finally quiet is not a good idea. Answering a question is not worthy of a "good job," nor is eating a bite of food. God help us if any of these kids end up in the military.
 
What will these perpetually desperate kids do when they are not around adults who adore them? They cry, act out, throw tantrums and then tell their parents that other adults are mean to them.
 
Coddling whining and attention-desperate children only makes their behavior worse. Today's young parents are so afraid of their kids being "hurt" and that their feelings are somehow more fragile than theirs were, that they are creating emotionally dependent and frail children. And what they refuse to acknowledge, is that other adults do not care to be around these kids. 
 
Coddling children who behave badly is them up to fail - it's just a matter of time. I just pray that the inevitable meltdowns are not in public.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

President Pantywaist

Extra! Extra! Read All About President Pantywaist!


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tea Party Interruptus

We are hearing loud noise from the odiferous left that the Huffing Post is soliciting uber-kooks to interrupt the Tax Day Tea Parties.
 
Friend Mark Williams added this to his news site today: I have been informed that one of the things that they will attempt to do is to try and discredit us by having their people show up with things like Nazi Flags and signs with racist slogans on them.  They are going to make a play for the TV cameras and try to portray themselves as typical Tea Party protesters.
 
If true, these weirdos will only prove how deranged they are. Williams stresses to be careful with them - do not touch them as they are trying to incite violence in order to scream assault. I suggested that we hold them down, bathe them, apply makeup, hair products and nail polish to the women.
 
Williams writes: At the same time, be careful around them.  Aside from the fact that fleas and lice can make the jump from their bodies to yours (and these people tend to have, shall we say, an “aroma”) they are nuts.  I mean seriously nuts, we have had some of our people physically attacked (by Code Pink freaks both here and in Berkeley.)   DO grab the nearest cop if any of these morons even looks cross-eyed at you but DO NOT touch them, that’s assault and exactly what they are trying to goad you into doing.
 
Bizarre. The far left is truly sick. Mark Williams warns Some of you have heard me play the tapes on the air of “Peace” protesters screaming at me that Jews should be blown up, soldiers should be assassinated and other little missives from their pointy little heads.   They young ones are just stupid, the older ones are just pissed off at a life time of personal failure, and inability to get what you have by other means.
 
I agree. I've run into these freaks. The stupidity in the youth is somewhat expected, but the level of loosers masquerading around as adults is staggering. What horrible lives these people must have.... but before you feel sorry for them, put on bug spray and wear perfume. The smell is stupifying.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Teachers tour Cuba in August

UPDATED column: Along with my post about teachers touring Cuba this summer, we had the idiot congressional delegation to Cuba. Mona Charon, author of Useful Idiots, wrote this great column: Useful Idiots Caucus
 
 
My column Teachers Tour Cuba In August along with an interesting reader comment at the end.
This is comforting: Two "extraordinary" delegations are heading down to Cuba from August 1 to 8, 2009. Both are official programs designed by Cubans to familiarize friends from abroad with island advances that hold vital lessons for social well being and environmental sustainability.
 
Not kidding... I received this infornmation in an email today. Here is the rest of the information, just in case you are a teacher and need to learn about social well being and environmental sustainability.
 
These journeys are for people like you keen on learning about the island's renowned education system and its hallmarked eco-alternatives
and organic farming achievements.
We warmly invite you to join us and serve as a people's ambassador to
the island this summer.
 
Our TEACHERS INTRODUCTION TO CUBA TOUR is for educators seeking to discover the reasons why Cuban youth rank highest academically in the
Americas, and how come island teachers are held in such high esteem. You'll get a firsthand take on Cuba's free education to through
university, and the resulting social benefits.
 
Members of this envoy will meet, dialogue and network with distinguished pedagogical authorities from K-12 institutions, universities, and unions and ministries of education. Tour delegates will also experience unparalleled cultural activities including Cuban music and dance lessons and ample nightlife. You can plan on an engagement with a world-famed urban planner, meet-and-greets with contemporary artists, and an exclusive glimpse into Afrocuban life.

You'll see many facets of the stunning cosmopolitan capital of Havana, and rustic farm villages in western Pinar del Rio province, and the awe-inspiring tropical geography of Vinales Valley -- all from the comfort of your five-star Hotel Habana Libre in the heart of the city's leisure hub.

This tour is a professional development opportunity to witness stellar progress that all caring teachers aspire to, while making new friends in
Cuba and amongst your tour colleagues. It's a primer on education in Cuba without equal. See an elaborated itinerary and costs at:
 
I really hate people who "dialogue." I prefer to talk.
 
UPDATE: I received the following astute commentary about this post:
 
This Cuba thing  -- I wonder if the authors of this program, and the participants, will consider how education functions in a command society.   Incorrigible and uneducable students may be  exiled to work programs, fully knowing that the state can imprison or even execute them if they are a burden or embarassment. 
 
Most societies, including free ones, could guarantee high achievement in their schools if students were educated according to  their abilities and aptitudes, and were forced to understand that screwing up has automatic consequences. 
These conditions existed in the United States until the 1960's, and produced capable, employable graduates.  Consider what's happened to the American education system and American society since the sixties.  Depressing to think that Cuba may be producing better educated students.
 
Love,
 
Dad
 
yup, my Dad. History teacher extraordinaire
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Privileged Mediocrity and Affirmative Action

A friend at work uses the expression "Privileged Mediocrity" to describe that small group of people who control everything that affects our lives: Government agencies, Wall Street, Politics, and of course, the liberal media.
 
I take it one step further and throw affirmative action into the heap. Since the late 1970's, so many of the mediocre meatheads who find themselves working in government, politics and media, went to college under false circumstances: they only got there because of  Affirmative Action and that old level playing field. Had there need no affirmative action, they would have either gone to a trade school, gone right to work and if they were determined to get a college education, they would have attended Community College. Instead, with mediocre grades, they filled up top-notch colleges and universities, taking the places of kids who had the grades to get in but could not because they were too white, too anglo-saxon, lacking "ethnicity."
 
Affirmative Action has always perplexed me.  The last thing I would ever want, is anyone thinking I did not earn my way - that I was gifted a position because of my ethnicity. I only went to state college (like Sarah Palin) because even with a very high GPA coming out of high school, I got no points for my anglo-saxon parents, or my anglo name and Irish-Welsh heritage. Berkeley wasn't accepting anglo kids with 3.9 GPA's. But if my name had been Swift Antelope, or Enriqueta Ramirez or Shaniqua Johnson, I would have "earned" a place.
 
Our President was the recipient of Affirmative Action benefit, right into the White House.  In his 1995 memoir, Dreams from My Father, Obama admits that he used marijuana and cocaine as a teenager, and was only a mediocre student. Obama graduated high school the year before I did. A mediocre student from a high school in Hawaii went to Occidential College, transfered to Columbia and then Harvard.
 
California schools are jam-packed with professional, entitlement students who receive BS grants just for having an ethnic background, but are middle-of-the-road students. They fill up the universities, graduate and get jobs with the state. The entitlement continues. As mediocre students, they fill up colleges they were not qualified to attend. And many of the kids who did qualify to attend, are pushed out because they are white.
 
Community college is where the majority of the mediocre students need to be if they truly want to be educated. The level playing field is killing this country. And if President Obama is any example, America is in trouble.
 
I am an employer. I see what the colleges are producing. And I am the mother of a very bright college-age son. How is it that he earned a full-ride $300,000 scholarship to the United States Naval Academy - arguably one of the most exceptional educational institutions in the country - but was turned down by UC Berkeley? He is of anglo-saxon heritage. However, every one of his friends with any legitimate ethnicity in their heritage and mediocre grades, was acetped to UC campuses all over the state. And to add insult to injury, they pay very little of the cost of the education.  (and trust me, we are glad he's not at Berkeley)
 
Gone is the pride of earning for so many. There are parents who have taught their kids that to earn their way to success will bring greater rewards, but the masses are standing around their their hands out.
 
Privileged Mediocrity is what is running the country right now. Affirmative Action got them there.
 
In doing research for this column, I discovered some information about President Obama's affirmative action education:
 
Here are some troubling facts about Obama's intelligence:

Even though he applied to college in the heyday of race preferences, he had to settle for Occidental College. He then transferred to Columbia where he took no classes from distinguished professors.

It is common knowledge that "minority" admits to HLS are 2-3 SDs below the nonpreferred

Obama published nothing at U Chicago Law, yet he was offered a tenured position there.
Per the Wall Street Journal September 11, 2008, "Obama's Lost Years," Obama graduated from Columbia University (to which he transferred after his first two years at Occidental College in California), with a degree in Political Science without honors, so had a GPA less than a 3.3. His roomate Sohale Siddiqi indicated Obama itially felt alienated, felt "very lost," and used drugs to get high, which could have led to low grades initially. The roomate indicates that he then turned serious and "stopped getting high." Obama transferred to Columbia because he was concerned with urban issues. Based on his overall undergraduate GPA of less than a 3.3, Mr. Obama's admission to Harvard Law School may reflect affirmative action statutes, low grades early, then higher grades later (purely speculation) and/or other factors.
 
How many other mediocre but ambitious people have traveled the same path? And why do they always end up working for the government?
 
more reading:
 
 
And don't forget Michelle Obama:
As Linda Chavez pointed out last summer:

Michelle Obama’s life is a case study in affirmative action....

At every step of her career, race has been central to her own identification and upward mobility. Judging from the quality of thinking and writing exhibited in her Princeton
thesis, Michelle would not likely have been admitted to Princeton (and later Harvard Law) had she been white. And of course affirmative action opened up jobs, first in a prestigious law firm and later as the vice president of community affairs at the University of Chicago medical center-earning $300,000 a year. She made it her first task at the hospital to steer more contracts to minority contractors. “She revised the contracting system, sending so much business to firms owned by women and other minorities that the hospital won awards,” the Times says.
 
I'd like your comments

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Taxpayer Rally at the Capitol

On April 15th on the West Steps of the State Capitol, taxpayers will gather in protest against Proposition 1A and the $16 Billion tax increase on the May ballot. HJTA's president Jon Coupal, Congressman Tom McClintock, and talk show host Eric Hogue will be among those attending the rally. Download a copy of the April 15th rally flyer that you can keep or give to others who may be interested in joining us as we stand up against unjust tax proposals.

CLICK HERE to download the flyer.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Geithner A Banker Now?

Investors Business Daily has a really interesting report about the Federal Government refusing to accept banks' repayments of TARP money. After denying that the Federal Government was trying to take over private businesses, why wouldn't they accept repayment... unless by refusing, the feds hold sway over those banks who accepted bailout money... sounds like Mafia to me. Tiny Tim Geithner must be growing a very long nose these days.

(IBD) "Didn't Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner say that it was not the administration's intent to control private companies? Then why is it reportedly reluctant to accept TARP repayments from some banks? If it has indeed declined to accept $340 million in payments from banks in Louisiana, New York, Indiana and California, the administration is tacitly admitting that it wants to control those banks as well as others that will try to pay back the taxpayers' money they took in the Troubled Asset Relief Program. By refusing repayment, the government can keep the leverage it bought with the bailouts. Banks that still 'owe' would not be in position to reject the administration as a 'partner.' This reminds us of mobsters making a small 'investment' in a family-owned shop, which is not always wanted by the owners, and then using it to justify taking over the business. ... Before his trip to Europe, President Obama, according to Politico, told a group of financial institution CEOs who were unhappy with the federal war on executive salaries and bonuses, 'My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.' At the time, that sounded like nothing more than exaggeration. ... Looking back, these are small signs that reveal the administration's desire to seize command of the nation's financial system. The bigger, unmistakable sign is the reluctance -- or is it outright refusal? -- to take $340 million from four banks trying to be responsible and operate on their own. This shouldn't be happening in this country. The private sector and the state are not to be mixed. The American financial system is best directed by markets, not politics. Prosperity and liberty suffer when the latter excludes the former." --Investor's Business Daily
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barney Frank Eviscerated By A College Student

During a speech at Harvard, Barney Frank has his entrails removed by a college student. As priceless as it is, Frank put on public display, what a pompous dolt he is, as he condescended and tried to embarrass a college student for asking policy questions. The mere fact that he couldn't answer the kid, should demonstrate to every one of his constituents that he is a has-been.
 
Real Clear Politics has the video.  HERE
 
How does a blithering idiot like Barney Frank ever get elected to anything? He can't complete a sentence or a thought, sounds like a cartoon character and has a pornographic lifestyle allowing a men's brothel to be run out of his apartment. He is physically repulsive, personally disingenuous, and an equal opportunity offendor.
 
But then, what am I talking about? California has it's share of elected morons starting with San Fran Nan - old wide eyes - Maxine Waters, Laura Richardson, Diane Watson, Henry Waxman.... eeewwww, each of these people is repugnant and elected. With what Nancy Pelosi spends on facial reconstructive surgeries, she could pay for all of the California Representatives to have complete makeovers.. but would do nothing to correct their flawed character.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Exactly is "Social Justice?"

Columnist Rebecca Hagelin hits it out of the park in her March 31st column Social Justice or Hatred? She analyzes how liberals hijack language to sell their sick causes.
 
What is (Bill) Ayers brand of "social justice" that now permeates our schools and society at large? It is a perversion of what Scripture calls for. If you read his text books and those of his compatriots, you know that he uses the term to call for overthrowing the free-market system - which affords equal opportunity for everyone - and replacing it with a system that forces the "redistribution of wealth" - and he's not afraid to use violence, hatred and class warfare to do it. He believes that America as a nation is today unjust and oppressive. He freely admits that he is a "communist street fighter". His courses, recommended books (such as Queering Elementary Education) and theories are now widely adopted at teacher's colleges around the country. Part of Ayer's success has been to first teach such messages of hatred and racism in inner-city schools. But like everything else from the spread of violent rap music, to the "gangsta clothing" styles and the attitudes that go with them, to the problems of out of wedlock sex and pregnancy, when you take advantage of disadvantaged kids and feed the problems, those ills eventually spread into the suburban communities as well. (Star Parker, the founder of CURE - the Coalition for Urban Renewal and Education www.urbanCURE.org ,is an expert on the subject of how "The legacy of American socialism is our blighted inner-cities, dysfunctional inner-city schools, and broken black families." She has also writes and speaks extensively on how such problems eventually spread throughout all of American culture.)

So, the next time you hear the phrase, "social justice", take time to question the one who is using it, and challenge them to read some of the resources I have mentioned above. Maybe their motives are pure and they are using the word "justice" in its classic, biblical sense. But chances are they have no idea that the vision of justice that has taken their hearts captive was perpetrated by a terrorist who is using their good will to spread his hatred and to bring forth a more authoritative government where the individual is held captive to a few elitists with ultimate power.

read Hagelin's entire column:
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive